Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 565

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A general strategy for the evolution of bond-forming enzymes using yeast display

Open access
Chen, Irwin, Dorr, Brent M., Liu, David R.·2011·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The ability to routinely generate efficient protein catalysts of bond-forming reactions chosen by researchers, rather than nature, is a long-standing goal of the molecular life sciences. Here, we describe a directed evolution strategy for enzymes that catalyze, in principle, any bond-forming reaction. The system integrates yeast display, enzyme-mediated bioconjugation, and fluorescence-activated cell sorting to isolate cells expressing proteins that catalyze the coupling of two substrates chosen by the researcher. We validated the system using model screens for Staphylococcus aureus sortase A–catalyzed transpeptidation activity, resulting in enrichment factors of 6,000-fold after a single round of screening. We applied the system to evolve sortase A for improved catalytic activity. After eight rounds of screening, we isolated variants of sortase A with up to a 140-fold increase in LPETG-coupling activity compared with the starting wild-type enzyme. An evolved sortase variant enabled much more efficient labeling of LPETG-tagged human CD154 expressed on the surface of HeLa cells compared with wild-type sortase. Because the method developed here does not rely on any particular screenable or selectable property of the substrates or product, it represents a powerful alternative to existing enzyme evolution methods.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1101046108

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. 10.1126/science.1188934 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1073/pnas.0914067107 · DOI
  3. 10.1073/pnas.0507705102 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1038/nchembio.2007.31 · DOI
  5. 10.1038/nbt0706-769 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/S0958-1669(03)00092-2 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1016/S0958-1669(03)00099-5 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1016/j.cbpa.2008.01.027 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.sbi.2005.06.004 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2003.09.001 · DOI
  11. 10.1038/nbt1341 · DOI
  12. 10.1073/pnas.0504733102 · DOI
  13. 10.1039/b616252e · DOI
  14. 10.1021/ja046238v · DOI
  15. 10.1021/ja053322h · DOI
  16. 10.1038/nature06032 · DOI
  17. 10.1038/80267 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.sbi.2007.08.012 · DOI
  19. 10.1038/nbt0697-553 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1038/nchembio.80 · DOI
  21. 10.1021/ja047749k · DOI
  22. 10.1021/cb700054k · DOI
  23. 10.1002/cbic.200800724 · DOI
  24. 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0049 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1093/nar/gni116 · DOI
  26. 10.1074/jbc.M800974200 · DOI
  27. 10.1021/bi700448e · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.ab.2003.10.023 · DOI
  29. 10.1074/jbc.M109.022624 · DOI
  30. 10.1073/pnas.0910781107 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1073/pnas.0809851105 · DOI
  32. 10.1002/cbic.200900384 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.02.010 · DOI
  34. 10.1126/science.1152692 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1038/nature06879 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1126/science.1190239 · DOI

Cited by

See all 565

Metadata

Authors
Chen, I., Dorr, B. M., & Liu, D. R.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2011-06-22
Volume
108
Issue
28
Pages
11399-11404
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2075601360
Cited by
565
References
1
FWCI
8.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.