Cited by 195Protein Degradation and InhibitorsUbiquitin and proteasome pathwaysChemical Synthesis and Analysis

The E3 ligase adapter cereblon targets the C-terminal cyclic imide degron

Open access
Ichikawa, Saki, Flaxman, Hope A., Xu, Wenqing, Vallavoju, Nandini, Lloyd, Hannah C., Wang, Binyou, Shen, Dacheng, Pratt, Matthew R. +1 more·2022·Nature

Abstract

The ubiquitin E3 ligase substrate adapter cereblon (CRBN) is a target of thalidomide and lenalidomide 1, therapeutic agents used in the treatment of haematopoietic malignancies 2-4 and as ligands for targeted protein degradation 5-7. These agents are proposed to mimic a naturally occurring degron; however, the structural motif recognized by the thalidomide-binding domain of CRBN remains unknown. Here we report that C-terminal cyclic imides, post-translational modifications that arise from intramolecular cyclization of glutamine or asparagine residues, are physiological degrons on substrates for CRBN. Dipeptides bearing the C-terminal cyclic imide degron substitute for thalidomide when embedded within bifunctional chemical degraders. Addition of the degron to the C terminus of proteins induces CRBN-dependent ubiquitination and degradation in vitro and in cells. C-terminal cyclic imides form adventitiously on physiologically relevant timescales throughout the human proteome to afford a degron that is endogenously recognized and removed by CRBN. The discovery of the C-terminal cyclic imide degron defines a regulatory process that may affect the physiological function and therapeutic engagement of CRBN.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-022-05333-5

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The underlying principles of molecular glue mechanisms might be rooted in partial mimicry of naturally occurring PPIs at preexisting sites of high PPI propensity, interactions further enhanced by a matching molecular glue.

    “Taken together, our findings provide another example that the underlying principles of molecular glue mechanisms might be rooted in the partial mimicry of naturally occurring PPIs at preexisting sites of high PPI propensity, interactions that are further enhanced by a matching molecular glue1,10,11,50–54.”

    From Cereblon induces G3BP2 neosubstrate degradation using molecular surface mimicry (2026) · cites this paper as [10]

    In “Cyclic imides are substrates for CRBN” (page not supplied), the paper shows that a naturally occurring degron can substitute for thalidomide in CRBN-dependent degraders, supporting a specific example of molecular mimicry. It does not establish that molecular glues generally act at sites of high preexisting protein–protein interaction propensity or enhance those natural interactions. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • This finding hints at a connection between acetylation and the C-terminal cyclic glutarimide degrons favored by CRBN.

    “This finding hints at a connection between acetylation and the C-terminal cyclic glutarimide degrons favored by CRBN [63].”

    From Acetylation: a new target for protein degradation in cancer (2025) · cites this paper as [63]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ichikawa, S., Flaxman, H. A., Xu, W., Vallavoju, N., Lloyd, H. C., Wang, B., Shen, D., Pratt, M. R., & Woo, C. M.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Woo, Christina M.
Venue
Nature
Published
2022-10-19
Volume
610
Issue
7933
Pages
775-782
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W4306810360
Cited by
195
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 73 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 2
FWCI
12.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Camille and Henry Dreyfus Foundation
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Harvard University
  • Ono Pharma Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  • National Cancer Institute
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM114537)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
Keywords
cereblon, E3 ubiquitin ligase, targeted protein degradation, thalidomide, lenalidomide, ubiquitination, protein degradation, post-translational modification, hematologic malignancies
MeSH terms
Lenalidomide, Asparagine, Cyclization, Dipeptides, Glutamine, Humans, Imides, Ligands, Peptide Hydrolases, Thalidomide, Proteome, Amino Acid Motifs, Ubiquitin-Protein Ligase Complexes, Ubiquitination, Proteolysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review