Cited by 105Lipid Membrane Structure and BehaviorCellular transport and secretionNanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies

Mobility in geometrically confined membranes

Open access
Domanov, Yegor A., Aimon, Sophie, Toombes, Gilman E. S., Renner, Marianne, Quemeneur, François, Triller, Antoine, Turner, Matthew S., Bassereau, Patricia·2011·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Lipid and protein lateral mobility is essential for biological function. Our theoretical understanding of this mobility can be traced to the seminal work of Saffman and Delbrück, who predicted a logarithmic dependence of the protein diffusion coefficient ( i ) on the inverse of the size of the protein and ( ii ) on the “membrane size” for membranes of finite size [Saffman P, Delbrück M (1975) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 72:3111—3113]. Although the experimental proof of the first prediction is a matter of debate, the second has not previously been thought to be experimentally accessible. Here, we construct just such a geometrically confined membrane by forming lipid bilayer nanotubes of controlled radii connected to giant liposomes. We followed the diffusion of individual molecules in the tubular membrane using single particle tracking of quantum dots coupled to lipids or voltage-gated potassium channels KvAP, while changing the membrane tube radius from approximately 250 to 10 nm. We found that both lipid and protein diffusion was slower in tubular membranes with smaller radii. The protein diffusion coefficient decreased as much as 5-fold compared to diffusion on the effectively flat membrane of the giant liposomes. Both lipid and protein diffusion data are consistent with the predictions of a hydrodynamic theory that extends the work of Saffman and Delbrück to cylindrical geometries. This study therefore provides strong experimental support for the ubiquitous Saffman–Delbrück theory and elucidates the role of membrane geometry and size in regulating lateral diffusion.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1102646108

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reducing the radius of a membrane tube reduced the mobility of both lipids and proteins with a factor of five compared to planar diffusion.

    “Recent experimental studies on membrane tubes show that reducing the radius of a membrane tube, which sets the relevant length scale in the Saffman-Delbruck theory, indeed reduced the mobility of both lipids and proteins with a factor of five compared to planar diffusion (Daniels and Turner, 2007; Domanov et al., 2011).”

    From Barriers in the brain: resolving dendritic spine morphology and compartmentalization (2014) · cites this paper as Domanov et al., 2011

    The Lipid Diffusion in Vesicles and Tubes section reports more than a 3-fold reduction in lipid diffusion on the thinnest tubes compared with planar membranes. The Transmembrane Protein Diffusion section reports up to a 5-fold reduction for proteins. Thus, the source supports reduced mobility for both, but not the claimed factor of five for both. Page numbers were not provided in the copy. (LLM, conf=0.94)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The thin and slender neck typical for mushroom spines could reduce the mobility of glutamate receptors compared to that on the dendritic shaft.

    “The thin and slender neck, typical for mushroom spines, is in that same range of radii as in these experiments by Domanov et al. (2011) and could therefore reduce the mobility of glutamate receptors, compared to that on the dendritic shaft.”

    From Barriers in the brain: resolving dendritic spine morphology and compartmentalization (2014) · cites this paper as Domanov et al., 2011

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Safran SA (2003) Statistical Thermodynamics of Surfaces, Interfaces, and Membranes (Westview Press, Boulder, CO).
  2. Lamb H (1997) Hydrodynamics (Cambridge Univ Press, New York).
  3. Almeida PFF, Vaz WLC (1995) Lateral diffusion in membranes. Structure and Dynamics of Membranes-From Cells to Vesicles (Handbook of Biological Physics), eds R Lipowsky and E Sackmann (Elsevier, Amsterdam), Vol 1, pp 305-357.
  4. Méléard P, Bagatolli LA, Pott T (2009) Giant unilamellar vesicle electroformation: From lipid mixtures to native membranes under physiological conditions. Methods in Enzymology, ed D Nejat (Academic, London), Vol 465, pp 161-176.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Domanov, Y. A., Aimon, S., Toombes, G. E. S., Renner, M., Quemeneur, F., Triller, A., Turner, M. S., & Bassereau, P.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Institut Curie, Centre de Recherche, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 168, Physico-Chimie Curie, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, 75248 Paris, France;
  • University of Warwick (GB)
Corresponding author
Bassereau, Patricia
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2011-07-18
Volume
108
Issue
31
Pages
12605-12610
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2021826089
Cited by
105
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche
  • École Supérieure de Physique et de Chimie Industrielles de la Ville de Paris
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/I005439/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies
Keywords
lateral diffusion, membrane geometry, protein diffusion coefficient, lipid diffusion, membrane confinement, giant liposomes, hydrodynamic theory, cylindrical membranes
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Animals, Biological Transport, Biotin, Cells, Cultured, Diffusion, Lipid Bilayers, Membrane Lipids, Membrane Proteins, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Models, Biological, Phosphatidylethanolamines, Polyethylene Glycols, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Glycosylphosphatidylinositols, Potassium Channels, Voltage-Gated, Nanotubes, Green Fluorescent Proteins, Rats, Unilamellar Liposomes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review