The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The catalytic domain of all eukaryotic cut-and-paste transposase superfamilies
Open accessAbstract
Cut-and-paste DNA transposable elements are major components of eukaryotic genomes and are grouped into superfamilies (e.g., hAT , P ) based on sequence similarity of the element-encoded transposase. The transposases from several superfamilies possess a protein domain containing an acidic amino acid triad (DDE or DDD) that catalyzes the “cut and paste” transposition reaction. However, it was unclear whether this domain was shared by the transposases from all superfamilies. Through multiple-alignment of transposase sequences from a diverse collection of previously identified and recently annotated elements from a wide range of organisms, we identified the putative DDE/D triad for all superfamilies. Furthermore, we identified additional highly conserved amino acid residues or motifs within the DDE/D domain that together form a “signature string” that is specific to each superfamily. These conserved residues or motifs were exploited as phylogenetic characters to infer evolutionary relationships among all superfamilies. The phylogenetic analysis revealed three major groups that were not previously discerned and led us to revise the classification of several currently recognized superfamilies. Taking the data together, this study suggests that all eukaryotic cut-and-paste transposable element superfamilies have a common evolutionary origin and establishes a phylogenetic framework for all future cut-and-paste transposase comparisons.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Keeling, P. J., Burger, G., Durnford, D. G., Lang, B. F., Lee, R. W., Pearlman, R. E., Roger, A. J., & Gray, M. W. (2005) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.09.005 · Cited by 579
Transposition of hAT elements links transposable elements and V(D)J recombination
Zhou, L., Mitra, R., Atkinson, P. W., Burgess Hickman, A., Dyda, F., & Craig, N. L. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03157 · Cited by 224
Cited by
A Field Guide to Eukaryotic Transposable Elements
Wells, J. N., & Feschotte, C. (2020) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-040620-022145 · Cited by 686
Transposable Elements, Epigenetics, and Genome Evolution
Fedoroff, N. V. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.338.6108.758 · Cited by 634
Genomic signatures of evolutionary transitions from solitary to group living
Kapheim, K. M., Pan, H., Li, C., Salzberg, S. L., Puiu, D., Magoc, T., Robertson, H. M., Hudson, M. E., Venkat, A., Fischman, B. J., et al. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa4788 · Cited by 409
Deacetylation of Fungal Exopolysaccharide Mediates Adhesion and Biofilm Formation
Lee, M. J., Geller, A. M., Bamford, N. C., Liu, H., Gravelat, F. N., Snarr, B. D., Le Mauff, F., Chabot, J., Ralph, B., Ostapska, H., et al. (2016) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.00252-16 · Cited by 122
The contribution of transposable elements to size variations between four teleost genomes
Gao, B., Shen, D., Xue, S., Chen, C., Cui, H., & Song, C. (2016) · Mobile DNA · doi:10.1186/s13100-016-0059-7 · Cited by 100
Metadata
- Authors
- Yuan, Y.-W., & Wessler, S. R.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2011-04-25
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 7884-7889
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2115171894
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 22.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The catalytic domain of all eukaryotic cut-and-paste transposase superfamilies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1104208108
- The paper
- Yuan, Y.-W., & Wessler, S. R. (2011). The catalytic domain of all eukaryotic cut-and-paste transposase superfamilies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1104208108
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.