Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 453

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

FLOWERING LOCUS T duplication coordinates reproductive and vegetative growth in perennial poplar

Open access
Hsu, Chuan-Yu, Adams, Joshua P., Kim, Hyejin, No, Kyoungok, Ma, Caiping, Strauss, Steven H., Drnevich, Jenny, Vandervelde, Lindsay, Ellis, Jeffrey D., Rice, Brandon M., Wickett, Norman, Gunter, Lee E., Tuskan, Gerald A., Brunner, Amy M., Page, Grier P., Barakat, Abdelali, Carlson, John E., dePamphilis, Claude W., Luthe, Dawn S., Yuceer, Cetin·2011·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Annual plants grow vegetatively at early developmental stages and then transition to the reproductive stage, followed by senescence in the same year. In contrast, after successive years of vegetative growth at early ages, woody perennial shoot meristems begin repeated transitions between vegetative and reproductive growth at sexual maturity. However, it is unknown how these repeated transitions occur without a developmental conflict between vegetative and reproductive growth. We report that functionally diverged paralogs FLOWERING LOCUS T1 ( FT1 ) and FLOWERING LOCUS T2 ( FT2 ), products of whole-genome duplication and homologs of Arabidopsis thaliana gene FLOWERING LOCUS T ( FT ), coordinate the repeated cycles of vegetative and reproductive growth in woody perennial poplar ( Populus spp.). Our manipulative physiological and genetic experiments coupled with field studies, expression profiling, and network analysis reveal that reproductive onset is determined by FT1 in response to winter temperatures, whereas vegetative growth and inhibition of bud set are promoted by FT2 in response to warm temperatures and long days in the growing season. The basis for functional differentiation between FT1 and FT2 appears to be expression pattern shifts, changes in proteins, and divergence in gene regulatory networks. Thus, temporal separation of reproductive onset and vegetative growth into different seasons via FT1 and FT2 provides seasonality and demonstrates the evolution of a complex perennial adaptive trait after genome duplication.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1104713108

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 453

Metadata

Authors
Hsu, C.-Y., Adams, J. P., Kim, H., No, K., Ma, C., Strauss, S. H., Drnevich, J., Vandervelde, L., Ellis, J. D., Rice, B. M., Wickett, N., Gunter, L. E., Tuskan, G. A., Brunner, A. M., Page, G. P., Barakat, A., Carlson, J. E., dePamphilis, C. W., Luthe, D. S., & Yuceer, C.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2011-06-08
Volume
108
Issue
26
Pages
10756-10761
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2116193229
Cited by
453
References
7
FWCI
39.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: FLOWERING LOCUS T duplication coordinates reproductive and vegetative growth in perennial poplar. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1104713108
The paper
Hsu, C.-Y., Adams, J. P., Kim, H., No, K., Ma, C., Strauss, S. H., Drnevich, J., Vandervelde, L., Ellis, J. D., Rice, B. M., Wickett, N., Gunter, L. E., Tuskan, G. A., Brunner, A. M., Page, G. P., Barakat, A., Carlson, J. E., dePamphilis, C. W., Luthe, D. S., & Yuceer, C. (2011). FLOWERING LOCUS T duplication coordinates reproductive and vegetative growth in perennial poplar. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1104713108

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.