The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Causal evidence for frontal involvement in memory target maintenance by posterior brain areas during distracter interference of visual working memory
Open accessAbstract
Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is recruited during visual working memory (WM) when relevant information must be maintained in the presence of distracting information. The mechanism by which DLPFC might ensure successful maintenance of the contents of WM is, however, unclear; it might enhance neural maintenance of memory targets or suppress processing of distracters. To adjudicate between these possibilities, we applied time-locked transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) during functional MRI, an approach that permits causal assessment of a stimulated brain region's influence on connected brain regions, and evaluated how this influence may change under different task conditions. Participants performed a visual WM task requiring retention of visual stimuli (faces or houses) across a delay during which visual distracters could be present or absent. When distracters were present, they were always from the opposite stimulus category, so that targets and distracters were represented in distinct posterior cortical areas. We then measured whether DLPFC-TMS, administered in the delay at the time point when distracters could appear, would modulate posterior regions representing memory targets or distracters. We found that DLPFC-TMS influenced posterior areas only when distracters were present and, critically, that this influence consisted of increased activity in regions representing the current memory targets. DLPFC-TMS did not affect regions representing current distracters. These results provide a new line of causal evidence for a top-down DLPFC-based control mechanism that promotes successful maintenance of relevant information in WM in the presence of distraction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Neural Mechanisms of Selective Visual Attention
Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205 · Cited by 8,388
The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception
Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., & Chun, M. M. (1997) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.17-11-04302.1997 · Cited by 7,738
Prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia control access to working memory
McNab, F., & Klingberg, T. (2008) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn2024 · Cited by 989
An adaptive coding model of neural function in prefrontal cortex
Duncan, J. (2001) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/35097575 · Cited by 874
Concurrent TMS-fMRI and Psychophysics Reveal Frontal Influences on Human Retinotopic Visual Cortex
Ruff, C. C., Blankenburg, F., Bjoertomt, O., Bestmann, S., Freeman, E., Haynes, J.-D., Rees, G., Josephs, O., Deichmann, R., & Driver, J. (2006) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2006.06.057 · Cited by 514
Self-citationActive maintenance in prefrontal area 46 creates distractor-resistant memory
Sakai, K., Rowe, J. B., & Passingham, R. E. (2002) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn846 · Cited by 390
Filtering of neural signals by focused attention in the monkey prefrontal cortex
Everling, S., Tinsley, C. J., Gaffan, D., & Duncan, J. (2002) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn874 · Cited by 224
Mechanisms of Working Memory Disruption by External Interference
Clapp, W. C., Rubens, M. T., & Gazzaley, A. (2010) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp150 · Cited by 195
Cited by
The Cognitive Neuroscience of Working Memory
D'Esposito, M., & Postle, B. R. (2015) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015031 · Cited by 1,653
Top-down modulation: bridging selective attention and working memory
Gazzaley, A., & Nobre, A. C. (2012) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.11.014 · Cited by 1,404
Revisiting the role of persistent neural activity during working memory
Sreenivasan, K. K., Curtis, C. E., & D’Esposito, M. (2014) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.12.001 · Cited by 441
Roux, F., Wibral, M., Mohr, H. M., Singer, W., & Uhlhaas, P. J. (2012) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0421-12.2012 · Cited by 327
Reevaluating the Sensory Account of Visual Working Memory Storage
Xu, Y. (2017) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2017.06.013 · Cited by 264
Metadata
- Authors
- Feredoes, E., Heinen, K., Weiskopf, N., Ruff, C., & Driver, J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2011-10-10
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 42
- Pages
- 17510-17515
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2058401321
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 4.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Causal evidence for frontal involvement in memory target maintenance by posterior brain areas during distracter interference of visual working memory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1106439108
- The paper
- Feredoes, E., Heinen, K., Weiskopf, N., Ruff, C., & Driver, J. (2011). Causal evidence for frontal involvement in memory target maintenance by posterior brain areas during distracter interference of visual working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1106439108
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.