The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Control of body size by oxygen supply reveals size-dependent and size-independent mechanisms of molting and metamorphosis
Open accessAbstract
Body size profoundly affects many aspects of animal biology, including metamorphosis, allometry, size-dependent alternative pathways of gene expression, and the social and ecological roles of individuals. However, regulation of body size is one of the fundamental unsolved problems in developmental biology. The control of body size requires a mechanism that assesses size and stops growth within a characteristic range of sizes. Under normal growth conditions in Manduca sexta , the endocrine cascade that causes the brain to initiate metamorphosis starts when the larva reaches a critical weight. Metamorphosis is initiated by a size-sensing mechanism, but the nature of this mechanism has remained elusive. Here we show that this size-sensing mechanism depends on the limited ability of a fixed tracheal system to sustain the oxygen supply to a growing individual. As body mass increases, the demand for oxygen also increases, but the fixed tracheal system does not allow a corresponding increase in oxygen supply. We show that interinstar molting has the same size-related oxygen-dependent mechanism of regulation as metamorphosis. We show that low oxygen tension induces molting at smaller body size, consistent with the hypothesis that under normal growth conditions, body size is regulated by a mechanism that senses oxygen limitation. We also found that under poor growth conditions, larvae may never attain the critical weight but eventually molt regardless. We show that under these conditions, larvae do not use the critical weight mechanism, but instead use a size-independent mechanism that is independent of the brain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Scaling: Why is Animal Size so Important?
Schmidt-Nielsen, K. (1984) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139167826 · Cited by 2,677
Kaiser, A., Klok, C. J., Socha, J. J., Lee, W.-K., Quinlan, M. C., & Harrison, J. F. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0611544104 · Cited by 192 · cited 1×
“It has been suggested that the evolution of gigantic insects in the Paleozoic was associated with a high level of atmospheric oxygen (13, 17, 18).”
BackgroundLease, H. M., Wolf, B. O., & Harrison, J. F. (2006) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.02343 · Cited by 53
Cited by
Verberk, W. C. E. P., Atkinson, D., Hoefnagel, K. N., Hirst, A. G., Horne, C. R., & Siepel, H. (2021) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12653 · Cited by 363
Oxygen safety margins set thermal limits in an insect model system
Boardman, L., & Terblanche, J. S. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.120261 · Cited by 58
He, L. L., Shin, S. H., Wang, Z., Yuan, I., Weschler, R., Chiou, A., Koyama, T., Nijhout, H. F., & Suzuki, Y. (2020) · Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ibmb.2020.103452 · Cited by 53
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Callier, V., & Nijhout, H. F.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2011-08-22
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 35
- Pages
- 14664-14669
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2048724726
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Control of body size by oxygen supply reveals size-dependent and size-independent mechanisms of molting and metamorphosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1106556108
- The paper
- Callier, V., & Nijhout, H. F. (2011). Control of body size by oxygen supply reveals size-dependent and size-independent mechanisms of molting and metamorphosis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1106556108
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.