Antitumorigenic potential of STAT3 alternative splicing modulation
Open accessAbstract
Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) plays a central role in the activation of multiple oncogenic pathways. Splicing variant STAT3β uses an alternative acceptor site within exon 23 that leads to a truncated isoform lacking the C-terminal transactivation domain. Depending on the context, STAT3β can act as a dominant-negative regulator of transcription and promote apoptosis. We show that modified antisense oligonucleotides targeted to a splicing enhancer that regulates STAT3 exon 23 alternative splicing specifically promote a shift of expression from STAT3α to STAT3β. Induction of endogenous STAT3β leads to apoptosis and cell-cycle arrest in cell lines with persistent STAT3 tyrosine phosphorylation compared with total STAT3 knockdown obtained by forced splicing-dependent nonsense-mediated decay (FSD-NMD). Comparison of the molecular effects of splicing redirection to STAT3 knockdown reveals a unique STAT3β signature, with a down-regulation of specific targets (including lens epithelium-derived growth factor, p300/CBP-associated factor, CyclinC, peroxisomal biogenesis factor 1, and STAT1β) distinct from canonical STAT3 targets typically associated with total STAT3 knockdown. Furthermore, similar in vivo redirection of STAT3 alternative splicing leads to tumor regression in a xenograft cancer model, demonstrating how pharmacological manipulation of a single key splicing event can manifest powerful antitumorigenic properties and validating endogenous splicing…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Oligonucleotide-mediated enforced switching to preferential splicing of STAT3β has emphasized the anti-tumorigenic activity of STAT3β.
“a recent advance with an oligonucleotide-mediated enforced switching to preferential splicing of STAT3β (rather than STAT3α) has emphasized the anti-tumorigenic activity of STAT3β [18].”
From Selective STAT3-α or -β expression reveals spliceform-specific phosphorylation kinetics, nuclear retention and distinct gene expression outcomes (2012) · cites this paper as [18]
Cites
Transcription factors as targets for cancer therapy
Darnell, J. E. (2002) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc906 · Cited by 1,194 · see citing works
Caldenhoven, E., van Dijk, T. B., Solari, R., Armstrong, J., Raaijmakers, J. A. M., Lammers, J.-W. J., Koenderman, L., & de Groot, R. P. (1996) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.271.22.13221 · Cited by 373 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Targeted inhibition of tumor-specific glutaminase diminishes cell-autonomous tumorigenesis
Xiang, Y., Stine, Z. E., Xia, J., Lu, Y., O’Connor, R. S., Altman, B. J., Hsieh, A. L., Gouw, A. M., Thomas, A. G., Gao, P., et al. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci75836 · Cited by 409 · see citing works
3D scaffolds in breast cancer research
Rijal, G., & Li, W. (2016) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.12.016 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Ng, I. H. W., Ng, D. C. H., Jans, D. A., & Bogoyevitch, M. A. (2012) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj20120941 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Silent mutations reveal therapeutic vulnerability in RAS Q61 cancers
Kobayashi, Y., Chhoeu, C., Li, J., Price, K. S., Kiedrowski, L. A., Hutchins, J. L., Hardin, A. I., Wei, Z., Hong, F., Bahcall, M., et al. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04451-4 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zammarchi, F., de Stanchina, E., Bournazou, E., Supakorndej, T., Martires, K., Riedel, E., Corben, A. D., Bromberg, J. F., & Cartegni, L.
- Affiliations
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
- Antitumor Assessment Core Facility,
- Breast Cancer Service, Department of Medicine,
- Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Chemistry,
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics,
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2011-10-17
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 43
- Pages
- 17779-17784
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC3203802
- OpenAlex
- W2012197353
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 8.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Cancer Institute (BC074961)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research
- Keywords
- STAT3, alternative splicing, STAT3β, exon 23, antisense oligonucleotides, splicing enhancers, nonsense-mediated mRNA decay, apoptosis, cell cycle arrest, STAT3 tyrosine phosphorylation, LEDGF, PCAF, tumor regression, cancer therapy
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cell Line, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Flow Cytometry, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Mice, Nude, Neoplasms, Blotting, Western, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Oligonucleotides, Antisense, Alternative Splicing, DNA Primers, Protein Isoforms, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, In Situ Nick-End Labeling, RNA, Small Interfering, Microarray Analysis, STAT3 Transcription Factor, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review