Cited by 57Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase SignalingRNA Research and SplicingProtein Tyrosine Phosphatases

Silent mutations reveal therapeutic vulnerability in RAS Q61 cancers

Kobayashi, Yoshihisa, Chhoeu, Chhayheng, Li, Jiaqi, Price, Kristin S., Kiedrowski, Lesli A., Hutchins, Jamie L., Hardin, Aaron I., Wei, Zihan +4 more·2022·Nature

Abstract

RAS family members are the most frequently mutated oncogenes in human cancers. Although KRAS(G12C)-specific inhibitors show clinical activity in patients with cancer 1-3, there are no direct inhibitors of NRAS, HRAS or non-G12C KRAS variants. Here we uncover the requirement of the silent KRAS G60G mutation for cells to produce a functional KRAS(Q61K). In the absence of this G60G mutation in KRAS Q61K, a cryptic splice donor site is formed, promoting alternative splicing and premature protein termination. A G60G silent mutation eliminates the splice donor site, yielding a functional KRAS(Q61K) variant. We detected a concordance of KRAS Q61K and a G60G/A59A silent mutation in three independent pan-cancer cohorts. The region around RAS Q61 is enriched in exonic splicing enhancer (ESE) motifs and we designed mutant-specific oligonucleotides to interfere with ESE-mediated splicing, rendering the RAS(Q61) protein non-functional in a mutant-selective manner. The induction of aberrant splicing by antisense oligonucleotides demonstrated therapeutic effects in vitro and in vivo. By studying the splicing necessary for a functional KRAS(Q61K), we uncover a mutant-selective treatment strategy for RAS Q61 cancer and expose a mutant-specific vulnerability, which could potentially be exploited for therapy in other genetic contexts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-022-04451-4

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 47 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kobayashi, Y., Chhoeu, C., Li, J., Price, K. S., Kiedrowski, L. A., Hutchins, J. L., Hardin, A. I., Wei, Z., Hong, F., Bahcall, M., Gokhale, P. C., & Jänne, P. A.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
  • Guardant (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Kobayashi, Yoshihisa
Venue
Nature
Published
2022-03-02
Volume
603
Issue
7900
Pages
335-342
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W4214922368
Cited by
56
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10
FWCI
4.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases
Keywords
KRAS G12C, synonymous mutations, cryptic splice donor site, alternative splicing, exonic splicing enhancers, antisense oligonucleotides, oncogenic Ras
MeSH terms
Silent Mutation, Humans, Neoplasms, Oncogenes, Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras), Oligonucleotides, Antisense, Alternative Splicing, RNA Splice Sites

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review