The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Glial-conditional deletion of aquaporin-4 ( Aqp4 ) reduces blood–brain water uptake and confers barrier function on perivascular astrocyte endfeet
Open accessAbstract
Tissue- and cell-specific deletion of the Aqp4 gene is required to differentiate between the numerous pools of aquaporin-4 (AQP4) water channels. A glial-conditional Aqp4 knockout mouse line was generated to resolve whether astroglial AQP4 controls water exchange across the blood–brain interface. The conditional knockout was driven by the glial fibrillary acidic protein promoter. Brains from conditional Aqp4 knockouts were devoid of AQP4 as assessed by Western blots, ruling out the presence of a significant endothelial pool of AQP4. In agreement, immunofluorescence analysis of cryostate sections and quantitative immunogold analysis of ultrathin sections revealed no AQP4 signals in capillary endothelia. Compared with litter controls, glial-conditional Aqp4 knockout mice showed a 31% reduction in brain water uptake after systemic hypoosmotic stress and a delayed postnatal resorption of brain water. Deletion of astroglial Aqp4 did not affect the barrier function to macromolecules. Our data suggest that the blood–brain barrier (BBB) is more complex than anticipated. Notably, under certain conditions, the astrocyte covering of brain microvessels is rate limiting to water movement.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Astrocyte-endothelial interactions at the blood-brain barrier
Abbott, N. J., Rönnbäck, L., & Hansson, E. (2006) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1824 · Cited by 5,595
What is the blood–brain barrier (not)?
Bechmann, I., Galea, I., & Perry, V. H. (2007) · Trends in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.it.2006.11.007 · Cited by 520
Critical role of aquaporin-4 (AQP4) in astrocytic Ca 2+ signaling events elicited by cerebral edema
Thrane, A. S., Rappold, P. M., Fujita, T., Torres, A., Bekar, L. K., Takano, T., Peng, W., Wang, F., Rangroo Thrane, V., Enger, R., et al. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1015217108 · Cited by 254
Self-citation
Cited by
Iliff, J. J., Wang, M., Liao, Y., Plogg, B. A., Peng, W., Gundersen, G. A., Benveniste, H., Vates, G. E., Deane, R., Goldman, S. A., et al. (2012) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3003748 · Cited by 5,824
Self-citationDevelopment, maintenance and disruption of the blood-brain barrier
Obermeier, B., Daneman, R., & Ransohoff, R. M. (2013) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.3407 · Cited by 2,452
Verkhratsky, A., & Nedergaard, M. (2018) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00042.2016 · Cited by 1,678
Gliotransmitters Travel in Time and Space
Araque, A., Carmignoto, G., Haydon, P. G., Oliet, S. H. R., Robitaille, R., & Volterra, A. (2014) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.02.007 · Cited by 1,308
Astrocyte reactivity and reactive astrogliosis: costs and benefits
Pekny, M., & Pekna, M. (2014) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00041.2013 · Cited by 934
Metadata
- Authors
- Haj-Yasein, N. N., Vindedal, G. F., Eilert-Olsen, M., Gundersen, G. A., Skare, Ø., Laake, P., Klungland, A., Thorén, A. E., Burkhardt, J. M., Ottersen, O. P., & Nagelhus, E. A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2011-10-11
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 43
- Pages
- 17815-17820
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2119734225
- Cited by
- 336
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.