The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Molecular architecture of the 26S proteasome holocomplex determined by an integrative approach
Open accessAbstract
The 26S proteasome is at the executive end of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway for the controlled degradation of intracellular proteins. While the structure of its 20S core particle (CP) has been determined by X-ray crystallography, the structure of the 19S regulatory particle (RP), which recruits substrates, unfolds them, and translocates them to the CP for degradation, has remained elusive. Here, we describe the molecular architecture of the 26S holocomplex determined by an integrative approach based on data from cryoelectron microscopy, X-ray crystallography, residue-specific chemical cross-linking, and several proteomics techniques. The “lid” of the RP (consisting of Rpn3/5/6/7/8/9/11/12) is organized in a modular fashion. Rpn3/5/6/7/9/12 form a horseshoe-shaped heterohexamer, which connects to the CP and roofs the AAA-ATPase module, positioning the Rpn8/Rpn11 heterodimer close to its mouth. Rpn2 is rigid, supporting the lid, while Rpn1 is conformationally variable, positioned at the periphery of the ATPase ring. The ubiquitin receptors Rpn10 and Rpn13 are located in the distal part of the RP, indicating that they were recruited to the complex late in its evolution. The modular structure of the 26S proteasome provides insights into the sequence of events prior to the degradation of ubiquitylated substrates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Integrative structure modeling of macromolecular assemblies from proteomics data
Lasker, K., Phillips, J. L., Russel, D., Velázquez-Muriel, J., Schneidman-Duhovny, D., Tjioe, E., Webb, B., Schlessinger, A., & Sali, A. (2010) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.r110.000067 · Cited by 71
Self-citation
Cited by
The role of ubiquitination in tumorigenesis and targeted drug discovery
Deng, L., Meng, T., Chen, L., Wei, W., & Wang, P. (2020) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-020-0107-0 · Cited by 744
Atypical ubiquitylation — the unexplored world of polyubiquitin beyond Lys48 and Lys63 linkages
Kulathu, Y., & Komander, D. (2012) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm3394 · Cited by 619
Molecular Architecture and Assembly of the Eukaryotic Proteasome
Tomko, R. J., & Hochstrasser, M. (2013) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-060410-150257 · Cited by 376
Cryo-EM structures and dynamics of substrate-engaged human 26S proteasome
Dong, Y., Zhang, S., Wu, Z., Li, X., Wang, W. L., Zhu, Y., Stoilova-McPhie, S., Lu, Y., Finley, D., & Mao, Y. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0736-4 · Cited by 328
Building and remodelling Cullin–RING E3 ubiquitin ligases
Lydeard, J. R., Schulman, B. A., & Harper, J. W. (2013) · The EMBO Reports · doi:10.1038/embor.2013.173 · Cited by 327
Metadata
- Authors
- Lasker, K., Förster, F., Bohn, S., Walzthoeni, T., Villa, E., Unverdorben, P., Beck, F., Aebersold, R., Sali, A., & Baumeister, W.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2012-01-23
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1380-1387
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2046164706
- Cited by
- 442
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 25.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular architecture of the 26S proteasome holocomplex determined by an integrative approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1120559109
- The paper
- Lasker, K., Förster, F., Bohn, S., Walzthoeni, T., Villa, E., Unverdorben, P., Beck, F., Aebersold, R., Sali, A., & Baumeister, W. (2012). Molecular architecture of the 26S proteasome holocomplex determined by an integrative approach. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1120559109
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.