Nuclear receptor Nr4a1 modulates both regulatory T-cell (Treg) differentiation and clonal deletion
Open accessAbstract
Immature thymocytes expressing autoreactive T-cell receptors (TCR) can adopt differing cell fates: clonal deletion by apoptosis or deviation into alternative lineages such as FoxP3 + regulatory T cells (Treg). We revisited the role of the transcription factor Nr4a1 (Nur77), an immediate-early response gene induced by TCR engagement. Nr4a1KO mice show clear quantitative defects in antigen-induced clonal deletion. The impact of the Nr4a1 deletion is not enhanced by deletion of the proapoptotic factor Bim. In addition, Nr4a1 curtails initial differentiation into the Treg lineage in TCR transgenic mice and in nontransgenic mice. Transcriptional profiling of Nr4a1KO thymocytes under selection conditions reveals that Nr4a1 activates the transcription of several targets, consistent with these diverse actions: ( i ) Nr4a1 partakes in the induction of Bim after TCR triggering; ( ii ) perhaps paradoxically, Nr4a1 positively controls several transcripts of the Treg signature, in particular Ikzf2 and Tnfrsf9 ; ( iii ) consistent with its prosurvival and metabolic role in the liver, Nr4a1 is also required for the induction by TCR of a coordinated set of enzymes of the glycolytic and Krebs cycle pathways, which we propose may antagonize Treg selection as does activation of mTOR/Akt. Thus, Nr4a1 appears to act as a balancing molecule in fate determination at a critical juncture of T-cell differentiation.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The identified TFs (FOXK2 and NR4A1) have important roles in naive CD4+ T cell response upon TCR stimulation.
“Other studies have also shown that FOXK2 affects the activation of T lymphocytes77,78 and revealed the essential roles of NR4A1 in regulatory T cell differentiation79,80, suggesting that the identified TFs have important roles in naive CD4+ T cell response upon TCR stimulation.”
From Inferring gene regulatory networks from single-cell multiome data using atlas-scale external data (2025) · cites this paper as [80]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
T cell receptor signalling in the control of regulatory T cell differentiation and function
Li, M. O., & Rudensky, A. Y. (2016) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri.2016.26 · Cited by 493 · see citing works
A bacterial bile acid metabolite modulates Treg activity through the nuclear hormone receptor NR4A1
Li, W., Hang, S., Fang, Y., Bae, S., Zhang, Y., Zhang, M., Wang, G., McCurry, M. D., Bae, M., Paik, D., et al. (2021) · Cell Host & Microbe · doi:10.1016/j.chom.2021.07.013 · Cited by 306 · see citing works
Inferring gene regulatory networks from single-cell multiome data using atlas-scale external data
Yuan, Q., & Duren, Z. (2025) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-024-02182-7 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Rodríguez-Calvo, R., Tajes, M., & Vázquez-Carrera, M. (2017) · Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets · doi:10.1080/14728222.2017.1279146 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Jennings, E., Elliot, T. A. E., Thawait, N., Kanabar, S., Yam-Puc, J. C., Ono, M., Toellner, K.-M., Wraith, D. C., Anderson, G., & Bending, D. (2020) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108328 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
- Authors
- Fassett, M. S., Jiang, W., D'Alise, A. M., Mathis, D., & Benoist, C.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Department of Microbiology and Immunobiology, Division of Immunology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2012-02-15
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 3891-3896
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC3309794
- OpenAlex
- W1985520078
- Cited by
- 126
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 4.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM007753)
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI051530, AI051530, R37AI051530)
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (T32 DK7260, T32DK007260)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nuclear Receptors and Signaling
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
- Keywords
- Nur77, regulatory T cells, clonal deletion, thymocyte apoptosis, building information modeling, Foxp3, T cell receptor signaling, IKZF2, 4-1BB, glycolysis, TCA cycle, Akt/mTOR signaling, gene expression profiling, autoimmunity
- MeSH terms
- Bcl-2-Like Protein 11, Animals, Cell Differentiation, Cell Nucleus, Glycolysis, Membrane Proteins, Peptides, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, Time Factors, Transcription Factors, Apoptosis, Mice, Knockout, Cell Lineage, T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory, Apoptosis Regulatory Proteins, Mice, Nuclear Receptor Subfamily 4, Group A, Member 1, Thymocytes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review