The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rainfall-induced carbon dioxide pulses result from sequential resuscitation of phylogenetically clustered microbial groups
Open accessAbstract
The pulse of carbon dioxide (CO 2) resulting from the first rainfall after the dry summer in Mediterranean ecosystems is so large that it is well documented at the landscape scale, with the CO 2 released in a few days comparable in magnitude to the annual net carbon exchange of many terrestrial ecosystems. Although the origin of this CO 2 is debated, we show that the pulse of CO 2 is produced by a three-step resuscitation of the indigenous microbial community. Specific phylogenetic groups of microorganisms activate and contribute to the CO 2 pulse at different times after a simulation of the first rainfall following the severe summer drought. Differential resuscitation was evident within 1 h of wet-up, with three primary response strategies apparent according to patterns of relative ribosomal quantity. Most bacteria could be classified as rapid responders (within 1 h of wet-up), intermediate responders (between 3 and 24 h after wet-up), or delayed responders (24–72 h after wet-up). Relative ribosomal quantities of rapid responders were as high in the prewet dry soils as at any other time, suggesting that specific groups of organisms may be poised to respond to the wet-up event, in that they preserve their capacity to synthesize proteins rapidly. Microbial response patterns displayed phylogenetic clustering and were primarily conserved at the subphylum level, suggesting that resuscitation strategies after wet-up of dry soil may be a phylogenetically conserved ecological trait.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Desiccation tolerance of prokaryotes
Potts, M. (1994) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mr.58.4.755-805.1994 · Cited by 1,382
Pattern pluralism and the Tree of Life hypothesis
Doolittle, W. F., & Bapteste, E. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0610699104 · Cited by 546
Cited by
Global carbon dioxide emissions from inland waters
Raymond, P. A., Hartmann, J., Lauerwald, R., Sobek, S., McDonald, C., Hoover, M., Butman, D., Striegl, R., Mayorga, E., Humborg, C., et al. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12760 · Cited by 2,553
Responses of soil bacterial and fungal communities to extreme desiccation and rewetting
Barnard, R. L., Osborne, C. A., & Firestone, M. K. (2013) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2013.104 · Cited by 987
Self-citationBlazewicz, S. J., Barnard, R. L., Daly, R. A., & Firestone, M. K. (2013) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2013.102 · Cited by 878
Self-citationMicrobiomes in light of traits: a phylogenetic perspective
Martiny, J. B. H., Jones, S. E., Lennon, J. T., & Martiny, A. C. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aac9323 · Cited by 834
Stegen, J. C., Fredrickson, J. K., Wilkins, M. J., Konopka, A. E., Nelson, W. C., Arntzen, E. V., Chrisler, W. B., Chu, R. K., Danczak, R. E., Fansler, S. J., et al. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms11237 · Cited by 409
Metadata
- Authors
- Placella, S. A., Brodie, E. L., & Firestone, M. K.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2012-06-19
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 27
- Pages
- 10931-10936
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2135698100
- Cited by
- 521
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 39.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rainfall-induced carbon dioxide pulses result from sequential resuscitation of phylogenetically clustered microbial groups. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1204306109
- The paper
- Placella, S. A., Brodie, E. L., & Firestone, M. K. (2012). Rainfall-induced carbon dioxide pulses result from sequential resuscitation of phylogenetically clustered microbial groups. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1204306109
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.