Cited by 41

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

TBC1D16 is a Rab4A GTPase activating protein that regulates receptor recycling and EGF receptor signaling

Goueli, Basem S., Powell, Marianne Broome, Finger, Elizabeth C., Pfeffer, Suzanne R.·2012·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Rab4A is a master regulator of receptor recycling from endocytic compartments to the plasma membrane. The protein TBC1D16 is up-regulated in melanoma, and TBC1D16-overexpressing melanoma cells are dependent on TBC1D16. We show here that TBC1D16 enhances the intrinsic rate of GTP hydrolysis by Rab4A. TBC1D16 is both cytosolic and membrane associated; the membrane-associated pool colocalizes with transferrin and EGF receptors (EGFRs) and early endosome antigen 1, but not with LAMP1 protein. Expression of two TBC1D16 isoforms, but not the inactive R494A mutant, reduces transferrin receptor recycling but has no effect on transferrin receptor internalization. Expression of TBC1D16 alters GFP-Rab4A membrane localization. In HeLa cells, overexpression of TBC1D16 enhances EGF-stimulated EGFR degradation, concomitant with decreased EGFR levels and signaling. Thus, TBC1D16 is a GTPase activating protein for Rab4A that regulates transferrin receptor recycling and EGFR trafficking and signaling.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1204540109

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The accumulation of EGF in a RAB4-positive recycling compartment upon pathogenic LRRK2 expression or RNAi of either RAB8A or RAB10 reflects a crosstalk between recycling and degradative trafficking pathways.

    “The accumulation of EGF in a RAB4-positive recycling compartment upon pathogenic LRRK2 expression or RNAi of either RAB8A or RAB10 reflects a crosstalk between recycling and degradative trafficking pathways, which has been described before [64,65,66].”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. 10.1038/nchembio.149 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.ceb.2010.04.007 · DOI
  3. 10.1038/nature04847 · DOI
  4. 10.1074/jbc.M705221200 · DOI
  5. 10.1083/jcb.200612068 · DOI
  6. 10.1083/jcb.200911018 · DOI
  7. 10.1083/jcb.200703047 · DOI
  8. 10.1074/jbc.M111.261115 · DOI
  9. 10.1002/path.2804 · DOI
  10. 10.1111/j.1755-148X.2008.00505.x · DOI
  11. 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90307-X · DOI
  12. 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90414-8 · DOI
  13. 10.1038/nrm1500 · DOI
  14. 10.1083/jcb.200510010 · DOI
  15. 10.1083/jcb.140.5.1039 · DOI
  16. 10.1242/jcs.01560 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.cub.2006.07.020 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2008.07.029 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/S0079-6123(08)81001-1 · DOI
  20. 10.1182/blood-2005-12-007484 · DOI
  21. 10.1042/BST0371193 · DOI
  22. 10.1091/mbc.e08-12-1228 · DOI
  23. 10.1083/jcb.200312034 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Goueli, B. S., Powell, M. B., Finger, E. C., & Pfeffer, S. R.
Affiliations
  • Department of Biochemistry, and
  • Division of Radiation and Cancer Biology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2012-09-10
Volume
109
Issue
39
Pages
15787-15792
ISSN
  • 0027-8424
  • 1091-6490
Cited by
41
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review