Cited by 23

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dysregulation of dopamine receptor D2 as a sensitive measure for Huntington disease pathology in model mice

Crook, Zachary R., Housman, David E.·2012·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The ability to quantitatively evaluate the impact of a potential therapeutic intervention for Huntington disease (HD) in animal models for the disease is a critical step in the pathway to development of an effective therapy for this devastating neurodegenerative disorder. We report here an approach that combines a cell-based assay’s quantitative accuracy and direct relationship to molecular processes with the ability to directly monitor effects in HD model mouse neurons. To accomplish this goal, we have developed an accurate quantitative reporter assay for a transcript known to be down-regulated as an early consequence of mutant huntingtin expression. This system uses mouse strains carrying a GFP reporter for the expression of the dopamine receptor D2, expressed in the medium spiny neurons of the basal ganglion. This receptor consistently demonstrates reduced expression in patients and murine models, and the FACS-based assay gives a highly accurate and quantitative readout of this pathology in mouse neurons expressing mutant huntingtin . For four genetic models and one viral model, a highly reproducible time course of loss of reporter expression is observed. This quantitative measure of HD pathology can be used to measure the effects of HD therapeutics in small cohorts with high confidence. We further demonstrate that the introduction of an shRNA against the huntingtin transgene by virus can improve this pathological status in medium spiny neurons transduced with the construct. We believe this system can be of great utility in the validation of effective therapeutic interventions for HD.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1204542109

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reduced striatal DRD2 was consistently demonstrated in patients and murine models and its dysregulation is a sensitive measure of HD pathology.

    “In fact, reduced striatal DRD2 was consistently demonstrated in patients 45,46,47,48,49 and murine models 27,35,50,51 and its dysregulation is a sensitive measure of HD pathology 37 .”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90585-E · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.12.035 · DOI
  3. 10.1093/hmg/9.9.1259 · DOI
  4. 10.1093/hmg/ddm133 · DOI
  5. 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2007.00350.x · DOI
  6. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2461-07.2007 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.08.052 · DOI
  8. 10.1093/brain/122.12.2353 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1016/S0306-4522(00)00008-7 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1073/pnas.95.11.6480 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1098/rstb.1999.0449 · DOI
  12. 10.1073/pnas.110078997 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.08.041 · DOI
  14. 10.1096/fj.06-6533fje · DOI
  15. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4318-07.2007 · DOI
  16. 10.1038/nature02033 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5492-07.2008 · DOI
  18. 10.1126/science.2147780 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.13-03-01080.1993 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81369-0 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1602/neurorx.2.3.447 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2008.12.001 · DOI
  23. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-08-03248.1999 · DOI
  24. 10.1093/hmg/8.1.115 · DOI
  25. 10.1002/cne.10776 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2010.12.017 · DOI
  27. 10.1093/hmg/11.6.633 · DOI
  28. 10.1038/nbt739 · DOI
  29. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0857-08.2008 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Crook, Z. R., & Housman, D. E.
Affiliations
Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2012-04-23
Volume
109
Issue
19
Pages
7487-7492
ISSN
  • 0027-8424
  • 1091-6490
Cited by
23
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review