Cited by 430Genetic Neurodegenerative DiseasesAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ResearchPrion Diseases and Protein Misfolding

Nonapoptotic neurodegeneration in a transgenic mouse model of Huntington's disease

Open access
Turmaine, Mark, Raza, Aysha, Mahal, Amarbirpal, Mangiarini, Laura, Bates, Gillian P., Davies, Stephen W.·2000·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Huntington's disease (HD) is a fatal inherited neurodegenerative disorder characterized by personality changes, motor impairment, and subcortical dementia. HD is one of a number of diseases caused by expression of an expanded polyglutamine repeat. We have developed several lines of mice that are transgenic for exon 1 of the HD gene containing an expanded CAG sequence. These mice exhibit a defined neurological phenotype along with neuronal changes that are pathognomonic for the disease. We have previously observed the appearance of neuronal intranuclear inclusions, but did not find evidence for neurodegeneration. In this study, we report that all lines of these mice develop a late onset neurodegeneration within the anterior cingulate cortex, dorsal striatum, and of the Purkinje neurons of the cerebellum. Dying neurons characteristically exhibit neuronal intranuclear inclusions, condensation of both the cytoplasm and nucleus, and ruffling of the plasma membrane while maintaining ultrastructural preservation of cellular organelles. These cells do not develop blebbing of the nucleus or cytoplasm, apoptotic bodies, or fragmentation of DNA. Neuronal death occurs over a period of weeks not hours. We also find degenerating cells of similar appearance within these same regions in brains of patients who had died with HD. We therefore suggest that the mechanism of neuronal cell death in both HD and a transgenic mouse model of HD is neither by apoptosis nor by necrosis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.110078997

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The R6/2 mouse model is an excellent model to study progressive early synaptic dysfunctions because it mimics the cognitive as well as motor phenotype of HD in the absence of any clear neuronal loss.

    “The HD mouse model, R6/2, is an excellent model to study progressive early synaptic dysfunctions, because this model mimics the cognitive as well as motor phenotype of HD in the absence of any clear neuronal loss.”

    From Dendritic Spine Instability Leads to Progressive Neocortical Spine Loss in a Mouse Model of Huntington's Disease (2013) · cites this paper as Turmaine et al., 2000

    The Abstract describes a progressive R6/2 neurological phenotype that includes an HD-like movement disorder. It does not establish a cognitive phenotype or examine early synaptic dysfunction. Contrary to an unqualified absence of neuronal loss, the Results report degenerating neurons in R6/2 mice from 14–14.5 weeks of age; page numbers were not supplied. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In R6/2 mice, neuronal loss is not evident until the very end stage of the disease.

    “In R6/2 mice, neuronal loss is not evident until the very end stage of the disease (Turmaine et al., 2000).”
  • Neuronal loss in R6/2 mice is not evident until the very end stage of the disease.

    “previous studies suggest that neuronal loss in R6/2 mice is not evident until the very end stage of the disease (Turmaine et al., 2000).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. [1]Vonsattel J-P G, Meyers R H, Stevens T J, Ferrante R J, Bird E D, Richardson E P. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1985;44:559–577. doi: 10.1097/00005072-198511000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  2. [2]Vonsattel J P G, DiFiglia M. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1998;57:369–384. doi: 10.1097/00005072-199805000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  3. [3]Robitaille Y, Lopes-Cendes I, Becher M, Rouleau G, Clark A W. Brain Pathol. 1997;7:877–881. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.1997.tb00893.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  4. [4]Ross C A, Becher M W, Coloner V, Engelender S, Wood J D, Sharp A H. Brain Pathol. 1997;7:1003–1017. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.1997.tb00898.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  5. [5]Mangiarini L, Sathasivam K, Seller M, Cozens B A, Harper A, Hetherington C, Lawton M, Trottier Y, Lehrach H, Davies S W, et al. Cell. 1996;87:493–506. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81369-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  6. [6]Davies S W, Turmaine M, Cozens B A, DiFiglia M, Sharp A H, Ross C A, Scherzinger E, Wanker E E, Mangiarini L, Bates G P. Cell. 1997;90:537–548. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80513-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  7. [7]Davies S W, Turmaine M, Cozens B A, Raza A S, Mahal A, Mangiarini L, Bates G P. Philos Trans R Soc London B. 1999;354:971–979. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1999.0448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  8. [9]Scherzinger E, Sittler A, Schweiger K, Heiser V, Lurz R, Hasenbank R, Bates G P, Lehrach H, Wanker E E. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:4604–4609. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.8.4604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  9. [10]Perutz M F. Trends Biochem Sci. 1999;24:58–63. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(98)01350-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  10. [11]DiFiglia M, Sapp E, Chase K O, Davies S W, Bates G P, Vonsattel J P, Aronin N. Science. 1997;277:1990–1993. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5334.1990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  11. [12]Becher M W, Kotzuk J A, Sharp A H, Davies S W, Bates G P, Price D L, Ross C A. Neurobiol Dis. 1998;4:387–398. doi: 10.1006/nbdi.1998.0168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  12. [13]Gourfinkel-An I, Cancel G, Duyckaerts C, Faucheaux B, Hauw J-J, Trottier Y, Brice A, Agid Y, Hirsch E C. NeuroReport. 1998;9:1823–1826. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199806010-00028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  13. [14]Hayashi Y, Kakita A, Yamada M, Koide R, Igarashi S, Takano H, Ikeuchi T, Wakabayashi K, Egawa S, Tsuji S, et al. Acta Neuropathol. 1998;96:547–552. doi: 10.1007/s004010050933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  14. [15]Igarashi S, Koide R, Shimohata T, Yamada M, Hayashi Y, Takano H, Date H, Oyake M, Sato T, Sato A, et al. Nat Genet. 1998;18:111–117. doi: 10.1038/ng0298-111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  15. [16]Li M, Miwa S, Kobayshi Y, Merry D E, Yamamoto M, Tanaka F, Doyu F, Hashizume Y, Fischbeck K H, Sobue G. Ann Neurol. 1998;44:249–254. doi: 10.1002/ana.410440216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  16. [17]Skinner P J, Koshy B T, Cummings C J, Klement I A, Helin K, Servadio A, Zoghbi H Y, Orr H T. Nature (London) 1997;389:971–974. doi: 10.1038/40153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  17. [18]Paulson H L, Perez M K, Trottier Y, Trojanowski J Q, Subramony S H, Das S S, Vig P, Mandel J L, Fischbeck K H, Pitmann R N. Neuron. 1997;19:333–344. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80943-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  18. [19]Holmberg M, Duyckaerts C, Dürr A, Cancel G, Gourfinkel-An I, Damier P, Faucheux B, Trottier Y, Hirsch E C, Agid Y, et al. Hum Mol Genet. 1998;7:913–918. doi: 10.1093/hmg/7.5.913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  19. [20]Schmidt T, Landwehrmeyer G B, Schmitt I, Trottier Y, Auberger G, Laccone F, Klockgether T, Völpel M, Epplen J T, Schöls L, et al. Brain Pathol. 1998;8:669–681. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.1998.tb00193.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  20. [21]Kerr J F R, Wyllie A H, Currie A R. Br J Cancer. 1972;26:239–257. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1972.33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  21. [22]Portera-Cailliau C, Hedreen J C, Price D L, Koliatsos V E. J Neurosci. 1995;15:3775–3787. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-05-03775.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  22. [23]Dragunow M, Faull R L M, Lawlor P, Beihartz E J, Singleton K, Walker E B, Mee E. Clin Neurosci Neuropathol. 1995;6:1053–1057. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199505090-00026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  23. [24]Brannon Thomas L, Gates D J, Richfield E K, O'Bien T F, Schweitzer J B, Steindler D A. Exp Neurol. 1995;133:265–272. doi: 10.1006/exnr.1995.1029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  24. [25]Clarke P G H. Anat Embryol. 1990;181:195–213. doi: 10.1007/BF00174615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  25. [26]Lucassen P J, Chung W C J, Kamphorst W, Swaab D F. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1997;56:887–900. doi: 10.1097/00005072-199708000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  26. [27]Jackson G R, Salecker I, Dong X, Yao X, Arnheim N, Faber P W, MacDonald M E, Zipursky S L. Cell. 1998;21:633–642. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80573-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  27. [28]Reddy P H, Williams M, Charles C, Garrett L, Pike-Buchanan L, Whetsell W O, Jr, Miller G, Tagle D. Nat Genet. 1998;20:198–202. doi: 10.1038/2510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  28. [29]Saudou F, Finkbinder S, Devys D, Greenberg M E. Cell. 1998;95:55–66. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81782-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  29. [30]Klement I A, Skinner P J, Kayfor M D, Yi H, Hersch S M, Clark H B, Zoghbi H Y, Orr H T. Cell. 1998;95:41–53. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81781-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  30. [31]Mayberg H S, Starkstein S E, Peyser C E, Brandt J, Dannals R F, Folstein S E. Neurology. 1992;42:1791–1797. doi: 10.1212/wnl.42.9.1791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  31. [32]Sotrel A, Paskevitch P A, Kiely D K, Bird E D, Williams R S, Myers R H. Neurology. 1991;41:1117–1123. doi: 10.1212/wnl.41.7.1117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  32. [33]Jackson M, Gentleman S, Lennox G, Ward L, Gray T, Randall K, Morell K, Lowe J. J Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 1995;21:18–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2990.1995.tb01024.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Turmaine, M., Raza, A., Mahal, A., Mangiarini, L., Bates, G. P., & Davies, S. W.
Affiliations
Guy's Hospital (GB)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2000-06-27
Volume
97
Issue
14
Pages
8093-8097
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1998974178
Cited by
430
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 12
FWCI
13.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding
Keywords
Huntington's disease, neuronal cell death, transgenic mouse model, polyglutamine expansion, CAG repeat expansion, neuronal intranuclear inclusions, anterior cingulate cortex, dorsal striatum, Purkinje cells, cerebellum
MeSH terms
Huntingtin Protein, Animals, Cell Nucleus, Cerebellum, Corpus Striatum, Disease Models, Animal, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Huntington Disease, Mice, Transgenic, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Neuroglia, Nuclear Proteins, Purkinje Cells, Cell Death, Age of Onset, Trinucleotide Repeat Expansion, In Situ Nick-End Labeling, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review