The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Emergence of neural encoding of auditory objects while listening to competing speakers
Open accessAbstract
A visual scene is perceived in terms of visual objects. Similar ideas have been proposed for the analogous case of auditory scene analysis, although their hypothesized neural underpinnings have not yet been established. Here, we address this question by recording from subjects selectively listening to one of two competing speakers, either of different or the same sex, using magnetoencephalography. Individual neural representations are seen for the speech of the two speakers, with each being selectively phase locked to the rhythm of the corresponding speech stream and from which can be exclusively reconstructed the temporal envelope of that speech stream. The neural representation of the attended speech dominates responses (with latency near 100 ms) in posterior auditory cortex. Furthermore, when the intensity of the attended and background speakers is separately varied over an 8-dB range, the neural representation of the attended speech adapts only to the intensity of that speaker but not to the intensity of the background speaker, suggesting an object-level intensity gain control. In summary, these results indicate that concurrent auditory objects, even if spectrotemporally overlapping and not resolvable at the auditory periphery, are neurally encoded individually in auditory cortex and emerge as fundamental representational units for top-down attentional modulation and bottom-up neural adaptation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The cortical organization of speech processing
Hickok, G., & Poeppel, D. (2007) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2113 · Cited by 5,495
Normalization as a canonical neural computation
Carandini, M., & Heeger, D. J. (2012) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3136 · Cited by 1,906
Neural correlates of auditory perceptual awareness under informational masking
Gutschalk, A., Micheyl, C., & Oxenham, A. J. (2008) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060138 · Cited by 201
Cited by
Cortical tracking of hierarchical linguistic structures in connected speech
Ding, N., Melloni, L., Zhang, H., Tian, X., & Poeppel, D. (2016) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4186 · Cited by 1,059
Self-citationMechanisms underlying selective neuronal tracking of attended speech at a “cocktail party”
Zion Golumbic, E. M., Ding, N., Bickel, S., Lakatos, P., Schevon, C. A., McKhann, G. M., Goodman, R. R., Emerson, R., Mehta, A. D., Simon, J. Z., et al. (2013) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.12.037 · Cited by 909
Self-citationSpeech rhythms and multiplexed oscillatory sensory coding in the human brain
Gross, J., Hoogenboom, N., Thut, G., Schyns, P., Panzeri, S., Belin, P., & Garrod, S. (2013) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001752 · Cited by 643
A hierarchy of linguistic predictions during natural language comprehension
Heilbron, M., Armeni, K., Schoffelen, J.-M., Hagoort, P., & de Lange, F. P. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2201968119 · Cited by 343
Adaptive Temporal Encoding Leads to a Background-Insensitive Cortical Representation of Speech
Ding, N., & Simon, J. Z. (2013) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5297-12.2013 · Cited by 323
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ding, N., & Simon, J. Z.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2012-07-02
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 29
- Pages
- 11854-11859
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2138164020
- Cited by
- 835
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 13.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Emergence of neural encoding of auditory objects while listening to competing speakers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1205381109
- The paper
- Ding, N., & Simon, J. Z. (2012). Emergence of neural encoding of auditory objects while listening to competing speakers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1205381109
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.