The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Adaptive Temporal Encoding Leads to a Background-Insensitive Cortical Representation of Speech
Open accessAbstract
Speech recognition is remarkably robust to the listening background, even when the energy of background sounds strongly overlaps with that of speech. How the brain transforms the corrupted acoustic signal into a reliable neural representation suitable for speech recognition, however, remains elusive. Here, we hypothesize that this transformation is performed at the level of auditory cortex through adaptive neural encoding, and we test the hypothesis by recording, using MEG, the neural responses of human subjects listening to a narrated story. Spectrally matched stationary noise, which has maximal acoustic overlap with the speech, is mixed in at various intensity levels. Despite the severe acoustic interference caused by this noise, it is here demonstrated that low-frequency auditory cortical activity is reliably synchronized to the slow temporal modulations of speech, even when the noise is twice as strong as the speech. Such a reliable neural representation is maintained by intensity contrast gain control and by adaptive processing of temporal modulations at different time scales, corresponding to the neural δ and θ bands. Critically, the precision of this neural synchronization predicts how well a listener can recognize speech in noise, indicating that the precision of the auditory cortical representation limits the performance of speech recognition in noise. Together, these results suggest that, in a complex listening environment, auditory cortex can selectively encode a speech stream in a background insensitive manner, and this stable neural representation of speech provides a plausible basis for background-invariant recognition of speech.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory
Oldfield, R. C. (1971) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4 · Cited by 35,900
Speech Recognition with Primarily Temporal Cues
Shannon, R. V., Zeng, F.-G., Kamath, V., Wygonski, J., & Ekelid, M. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.270.5234.303 · Cited by 3,024
Cortical oscillations and speech processing: emerging computational principles and operations
Giraud, A.-L., & Poeppel, D. (2012) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3063 · Cited by 1,917
Low-frequency neuronal oscillations as instruments of sensory selection
Schroeder, C. E., & Lakatos, P. (2009) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2008.09.012 · Cited by 1,528
Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of two simultaneous talkers
Brungart, D. S. (2001) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1345696 · Cited by 1,139
Temporal information in speech: acoustic, auditory and linguistic aspects
Rosen, S. (1992) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1992.0070 · Cited by 1,130
Selective cortical representation of attended speaker in multi-talker speech perception
Mesgarani, N., & Chang, E. F. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11020 · Cited by 1,007
Festen, J. M., & Plomp, R. (1990) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.400247 · Cited by 856
Emergence of neural encoding of auditory objects while listening to competing speakers
Ding, N., & Simon, J. Z. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1205381109 · Cited by 835
Self-citationObject-based auditory and visual attention
Shinn-Cunningham, B. G. (2008) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.02.003 · Cited by 729
Cited by
Cortical tracking of hierarchical linguistic structures in connected speech
Ding, N., Melloni, L., Zhang, H., Tian, X., & Poeppel, D. (2016) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4186 · Cited by 1,059
Self-citationKeitel, A., Gross, J., & Kayser, C. (2018) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2004473 · Cited by 312
Functional imaging of auditory scene analysis
Gutschalk, A., & Dykstra, A. R. (2014) · Hearing Research · doi:10.1016/j.heares.2013.08.003 · Cited by 57
Metadata
- Authors
- Ding, N., & Simon, J. Z.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2013-03-27
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 5728-5735
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2088984420
- Cited by
- 323
- References
- 42
- FWCI
- 7.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adaptive Temporal Encoding Leads to a Background-Insensitive Cortical Representation of Speech. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.5297-12.2013
- The paper
- Ding, N., & Simon, J. Z. (2013). Adaptive Temporal Encoding Leads to a Background-Insensitive Cortical Representation of Speech. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.5297-12.2013
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.