Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 369

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Putative DNA/RNA helicase Schlafen-11 (SLFN11) sensitizes cancer cells to DNA-damaging agents

Open access
Zoppoli, Gabriele, Regairaz, Marie, Leo, Elisabetta, Reinhold, William C., Varma, Sudhir, Ballestrero, Alberto, Doroshow, James H., Pommier, Yves·2012·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

DNA-damaging agents (DDAs) constitute the backbone of treatment for most human tumors. Here we used the National Cancer Institute Antitumor Cell Line Panel (the NCI-60) to identify predictors of cancer cell response to topoisomerase I (Top1) inhibitors, a widely used class of DDAs. We assessed the NCI-60 transcriptome using Affymetrix Human Exon 1.0 ST microarrays and correlated the in vitro activity of four Top1 inhibitors with gene expression in the 60 cell lines. A single gene, Schlafen-11 (SLFN11), showed an extremely significant positive correlation with the response not only to Top1 inhibitors, but also to Top2 inhibitors, alkylating agents, and DNA synthesis inhibitors. Using cells with endogenously high and low SLFN11 expression and siRNA-mediated silencing, we show that SLFN11 is causative in determining cell death and cell cycle arrest in response to DDAs in cancer cells from different tissues of origin. We next analyzed SLFN11 expression in ovarian and colorectal cancers and normal corresponding tissues from The Cancer Genome Atlas database and observed that SLFN11 has a wide expression range. We also observed that high SLFN11 expression independently predicts overall survival in a group of ovarian cancer patients treated with cisplatin-containing regimens. We conclude that SLFN11 expression is causally associated with the activity of DDAs in cancer cells, has a broad expression range in colon and ovarian adenocarcinomas, and may behave as a biomarker for prediction of response to DDAs in the clinical setting.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1205943109

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 369

Metadata

Authors
Zoppoli, G., Regairaz, M., Leo, E., Reinhold, W. C., Varma, S., Ballestrero, A., Doroshow, J. H., & Pommier, Y.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2012-08-27
Volume
109
Issue
37
Pages
15030-15035
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1972623885
Cited by
369
References
4
FWCI
3.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Putative DNA/RNA helicase Schlafen-11 (SLFN11) sensitizes cancer cells to DNA-damaging agents. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1205943109
The paper
Zoppoli, G., Regairaz, M., Leo, E., Reinhold, W. C., Varma, S., Ballestrero, A., Doroshow, J. H., & Pommier, Y. (2012). Putative DNA/RNA helicase Schlafen-11 (SLFN11) sensitizes cancer cells to DNA-damaging agents. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1205943109

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.