The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tangled bank of experimentally evolved Burkholderia biofilms reflects selection during chronic infections
Open accessAbstract
How diversity evolves and persists in biofilms is essential for understanding much of microbial life, including the uncertain dynamics of chronic infections. We developed a biofilm model enabling long-term selection for daily adherence to and dispersal from a plastic bead in a test tube. Focusing on a pathogen of the cystic fibrosis lung, Burkholderia cenocepacia, we sequenced clones and metagenomes to unravel the mutations and evolutionary forces responsible for adaptation and diversification of a single biofilm community during 1,050 generations of selection. The mutational patterns revealed recurrent evolution of biofilm specialists from generalist types and multiple adaptive alleles at relatively few loci. Fitness assays also demonstrated strong interference competition among contending mutants that preserved genetic diversity. Metagenomes from five other independently evolved biofilm lineages revealed extraordinary mutational parallelism that outlined common routes of adaptation, a subset of which was found, surprisingly, in a planktonic population. These mutations in turn were surprisingly well represented among mutations that evolved in cystic fibrosis isolates of both Burkholderia and Pseudomonas . These convergent pathways included altered metabolism of cyclic diguanosine monophosphate, polysaccharide production, tricarboxylic acid cycle enzymes, global transcription, and iron scavenging. Evolution in chronic infections therefore may be driven by mutations in relatively few pathways also favored during laboratory selection, creating hope that experimental evolution may illuminate the ecology and selective dynamics of chronic infections and improve treatment strategies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Convergent Evolution: Limited Forms Most Beautiful
McGhee, G. R. (2011) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9780262016421.001.0001 · Cited by 312
Highly adherent small-colony variants of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis lung infection
Häußler, S., Ziegler, I., Löttel, A., Götz, F. V., Rohde, M., Wehmhöhner, D., Saravanamuthu, S., Tümmler, B., & Steinmetz, I. (2003) · Journal of Medical Microbiology · doi:10.1099/jmm.0.05069-0 · Cited by 228
Cited by
Sequencing pools of individuals — mining genome-wide polymorphism data without big funding
Schlötterer, C., Tobler, R., Kofler, R., & Nolte, V. (2014) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3803 · Cited by 784
Dar, H. H., Tyurina, Y. Y., Mikulska-Ruminska, K., Shrivastava, I., Ting, H.-C., Tyurin, V. A., Krieger, J., St. Croix, C. M., Watkins, S., Bayir, E., et al. (2018) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci99490 · Cited by 251
Green Rust: The Simple Organizing ‘Seed’ of All Life?
Russell, M. J. (2018) · Life · doi:10.3390/life8030035 · Cited by 101
Deatherage, D. E., Traverse, C. C., Wolf, L. N., & Barrick, J. E. (2015) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2014.00468 · Cited by 93
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Traverse, C. C., Mayo-Smith, L. M., Poltak, S. R., & Cooper, V. S.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2012-12-27
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- E250-9
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1991690081
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tangled bank of experimentally evolved Burkholderia biofilms reflects selection during chronic infections. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1207025110
- The paper
- Traverse, C. C., Mayo-Smith, L. M., Poltak, S. R., & Cooper, V. S. (2013). Tangled bank of experimentally evolved Burkholderia biofilms reflects selection during chronic infections. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1207025110
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.