The DOI matches its Crossref record.
NMR structure of a lytic polysaccharide monooxygenase provides insight into copper binding, protein dynamics, and substrate interactions
Open accessAbstract
Lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases currently classified as carbohydrate binding module family 33 (CBM33) and glycoside hydrolase family 61 (GH61) are likely to play important roles in future biorefining. However, the molecular basis of their unprecedented catalytic activity remains largely unknown. We have used NMR techniques and isothermal titration calorimetry to address structural and functional aspects of CBP21, a chitin-active CBM33. NMR structural and relaxation studies showed that CBP21 is a compact and rigid molecule, and the only exception is the catalytic metal binding site. NMR data further showed that His28 and His114 in the catalytic center bind a variety of divalent metal ions with a clear preference for Cu 2+(Kd= 55 nM; from isothermal titration calorimetry) and higher preference for Cu 1+(Kd∼ 1 nM; from the experimentally determined redox potential for CBP21-Cu 2+of 275 mV using a thermodynamic cycle). Strong binding of Cu 1+was also reflected in a reduction in the p Ka values of the histidines by 3.6 and 2.2 pH units, respectively. Cyanide, a mimic of molecular oxygen, was found to bind to the metal ion only. These data support a model where copper is reduced on the enzyme by an externally provided electron and followed by oxygen binding and activation by internal electron transfer. Interactions of CBP21 with a crystalline substrate were mapped in a 2 H/1 H exchange experiment, which showed that substrate binding involves an extended planar binding surface, including the metal binding site. Such a planar catalytic surface seems well-suited to interact with crystalline substrates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Payne, C. M., Knott, B. C., Mayes, H. B., Hansson, H., Himmel, M. E., Sandgren, M., Ståhlberg, J., & Beckham, G. T. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500351c · Cited by 855
Biological Pretreatment of Lignocellulosic Biomass for Biofuels and Bioproducts: An Overview
Sharma, H. K., Xu, C., & Qin, W. (2019) · Waste and Biomass Valorization · doi:10.1007/s12649-017-0059-y · Cited by 617
Agger, J. W., Isaksen, T., Várnai, A., Vidal-Melgosa, S., Willats, W. G. T., Ludwig, R., Horn, S. J., Eijsink, V. G. H., & Westereng, B. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1323629111 · Cited by 425
Self-citationLytic Polysaccharide Monooxygenases in Biomass Conversion
Hemsworth, G. R., Johnston, E. M., Davies, G. J., & Walton, P. H. (2015) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2015.09.006 · Cited by 314
Xie, S., Syrenne, R., Sun, S., & Yuan, J. S. (2014) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2014.02.007 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- Aachmann, F. L., Sørlie, M., Skjåk-Bræk, G., Eijsink, V. G. H., & Vaaje-Kolstad, G.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2012-10-29
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 46
- Pages
- 18779-18784
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2104845210
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: NMR structure of a lytic polysaccharide monooxygenase provides insight into copper binding, protein dynamics, and substrate interactions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1208822109
- The paper
- Aachmann, F. L., Sørlie, M., Skjåk-Bræk, G., Eijsink, V. G. H., & Vaaje-Kolstad, G. (2012). NMR structure of a lytic polysaccharide monooxygenase provides insight into copper binding, protein dynamics, and substrate interactions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1208822109
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.