Cited by 242Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorMemory and Neural MechanismsNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology

Oxytocin facilitates protective responses to aversive social stimuli in males

Open access
Striepens, Nadine, Scheele, Dirk, Kendrick, Keith M., Becker, Benjamin, Schäfer, Lea, Schwalba, Knut, Reul, Jürgen, Maier, Wolfgang +1 more·2012·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The neuropeptide oxytocin (OXT) can enhance the impact of positive social cues but may reduce that of negative ones by inhibiting amygdala activation, although it is unclear whether the latter causes blunted emotional and mnemonic responses. In two independent double-blind placebo-controlled experiments, each involving over 70 healthy male subjects, we investigated whether OXT affects modulation of startle reactivity by aversive social stimuli as well as subsequent memory for them. Intranasal OXT potentiated acoustic startle responses to negative stimuli, without affecting behavioral valence or arousal judgments, and biased subsequent memory toward negative rather than neutral items. A functional MRI analysis of this mnemonic effect revealed that, whereas OXT inhibited amygdala responses to negative stimuli, it facilitated left insula responses for subsequently remembered items and increased functional coupling between the left amygdala, left anterior insula, and left inferior frontal gyrus. Our results therefore show that OXT can potentiate the protective and mnemonic impact of aversive social information despite reducing amygdala activity, and suggest that the insula may play a role in emotional modulation of memory.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1208852109

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is mounting evidence that oxytocin has anxiogenic and fear-enhancing effects.

    “However, against the background of mounting evidence for anxiogenic and fearenhancing OXT effects (33,43,44), it is necessary that the mechanisms determining the outcome of an OXT treatment are completely identified.”

    From Oxytocin enhances brain reward system responses in men viewing the face of their female partner (2013) · cites this paper as [33]

    The Discussion (p. 3) reports that oxytocin increased startle responses to negative social stimuli and improved memory for them, supporting a fear-enhancing effect in that context. It does not establish an anxiogenic effect: the paper describes prior anxiolytic findings and says its own results did not show increased arousal or valence ratings. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Exogenous OXT can have anxiogenic effects in humans exposed to social stimuli.

    “Likewise, exogenous OXT can have anxiogenic effects in humans exposed to social stimuli (Bartz et al., 2010; Striepens et al., 2012; Grillon et al., 2013; MacDonald et al., 2013).”

    From Sex-specific modulation of juvenile social play behavior by vasopressin and oxytocin depends on social context (2014) · cites this paper as Striepens et al., 2012

    The Discussion (p. 3) reports that oxytocin enhanced startle responses to aversive social stimuli, supporting a heightened defensive response. But it found no change in arousal or valence ratings and did not establish that oxytocin increased anxiety; the Discussion (p. 4) describes the effect as protective behavior with heightened caution. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Oxytocin changes activity in the insular cortex and ventromedial prefrontal cortex and reduces neural responses to stress-related and painful stimuli in the amygdala.

    “Furthermore, it has been shown that OXT not only modulates activity in the insular cortex (Striepens et al., 2012;Wigton et al., 2015) and VMPFC (Aoki et al., 2015;Labuschagne et al., 2012) but also reduces the neural response to stress-associated signals (Maier et al., 2018) and painful stimuli in the amygdala (AMY) (Paloyelis et al., 2016).”

    From Oxytocin enhances the pain‐relieving effects of social support in romantic couples (2019) · cites this paper as Striepens et al., 2012

  • Other studies have reported that oxytocin effects on amygdala responses often occur with concurrent changes in its connections with, and activation of, the insula.

    “Indeed, other studies have also reported that OXT effects on amygdala responses often occur with concurrent changes in its connections with, and activation of, the insula (27 -29).”

    From Oxytocin, the peptide that bonds the sexes also divides them (2016) · cites this paper as [28]

  • In the absence of social support, oxytocin may increase the sensation of social stress, augment the impact of aversive information on defensive responses, and induce a privileged recall of negative information by increasing neural responses in insular cortex.

    “On the other hand, in the absence of social support, OXT may increase the sensation of social stress, augment the impact of aversive information on defensive responses (i.e., the startle reflex), and induce a privileged recall of negative information by increasing neural responses in insular cortex (106,107).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 82 · Cited by 242

Authors
Striepens, N., Scheele, D., Kendrick, K. M., Becker, B., Schäfer, L., Schwalba, K., Reul, J., Maier, W., & Hurlemann, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Bonn (DE)
  • University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN)
  • Beta Clinic, 53227 Bonn, Germany; and
Corresponding author
Hurlemann, René
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2012-10-16
Volume
109
Issue
44
Pages
18144-18149
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2150568714
Cited by
242
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 24
FWCI
39.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DZNE Pub (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (HU1302/2-2)
  • Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Keywords
oxytocin, startle reactivity, emotional memory, amygdala, anterior insula, inferior frontal gyrus, neural coupling, male subjects
MeSH terms
Avoidance Learning, Brain, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Oxytocin, Placebos

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review