Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 295

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

CNS-specific immunity at the choroid plexus shifts toward destructive Th2 inflammation in brain aging

Open access
Baruch, Kuti, Ron-Harel, Noga, Gal, Hilah, Deczkowska, Aleksandra, Shifrut, Eric, Ndifon, Wilfred, Mirlas-Neisberg, Nataly, Cardon, Michal, Vaknin, Ilan, Cahalon, Liora, Berkutzki, Tamara, Mattson, Mark P., Gomez-Pinilla, Fernando, Friedman, Nir, Schwartz, Michal·2013·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The adaptive arm of the immune system has been suggested as an important factor in brain function. However, given the fact that interactions of neurons or glial cells with T lymphocytes rarely occur within the healthy CNS parenchyma, the underlying mechanism is still a mystery. Here we found that at the interface between the brain and blood circulation, the epithelial layers of the choroid plexus (CP) are constitutively populated with CD4 + effector memory cells with a T-cell receptor repertoire specific to CNS antigens. With age, whereas CNS specificity in this compartment was largely maintained, the cytokine balance shifted in favor of the T helper type 2 (Th2) response; the Th2-derived cytokine IL-4 was elevated in the CP of old mice, relative to IFN-γ, which decreased. We found this local cytokine shift to critically affect the CP epithelium, triggering it to produce the chemokine CCL11 shown to be associated with cognitive dysfunction. Partial restoration of cognitive ability in aged mice, by lymphopenia-induced homeostasis-driven proliferation of memory T cells, was correlated with restoration of the IL-4:IFN-γ ratio at the CP and modulated the expression of plasticity-related genes at the hippocampus. Our data indicate that the cytokine milieu at the CP epithelium is affected by peripheral immunosenescence, with detrimental consequences to the aged brain. Amenable to immunomodulation, this interface is a unique target for arresting age-related cognitive decline.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1211270110

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 46 references

Cited by

See all 295

Metadata

Authors
Baruch, K., Ron-Harel, N., Gal, H., Deczkowska, A., Shifrut, E., Ndifon, W., Mirlas-Neisberg, N., Cardon, M., Vaknin, I., Cahalon, L., Berkutzki, T., Mattson, M. P., Gomez-Pinilla, F., Friedman, N., & Schwartz, M.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2013-01-18
Volume
110
Issue
6
Pages
2264-2269
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2061660439
Cited by
295
References
46
FWCI
13.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CNS-specific immunity at the choroid plexus shifts toward destructive Th2 inflammation in brain aging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1211270110
The paper
Baruch, K., Ron-Harel, N., Gal, H., Deczkowska, A., Shifrut, E., Ndifon, W., Mirlas-Neisberg, N., Cardon, M., Vaknin, I., Cahalon, L., Berkutzki, T., Mattson, M. P., Gomez-Pinilla, F., Friedman, N., & Schwartz, M. (2013). CNS-specific immunity at the choroid plexus shifts toward destructive Th2 inflammation in brain aging. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211270110

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.