The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Characterizing the mechanics of cultured cell monolayers
Open accessAbstract
One-cell-thick monolayers are the simplest tissues in multicellular organisms, yet they fulfill critical roles in development and normal physiology. In early development, embryonic morphogenesis results largely from monolayer rearrangement and deformation due to internally generated forces. Later, monolayers act as physical barriers separating the internal environment from the exterior and must withstand externally applied forces. Though resisting and generating mechanical forces is an essential part of monolayer function, simple experimental methods to characterize monolayer mechanical properties are lacking. Here, we describe a system for tensile testing of freely suspended cultured monolayers that enables the examination of their mechanical behavior at multi-, uni-, and subcellular scales. Using this system, we provide measurements of monolayer elasticity and show that this is two orders of magnitude larger than the elasticity of their isolated cellular components. Monolayers could withstand more than a doubling in length before failing through rupture of intercellular junctions. Measurement of stress at fracture enabled a first estimation of the average force needed to separate cells within truly mature monolayers, approximately ninefold larger than measured in pairs of isolated cells. As in single cells, monolayer mechanical properties were strongly dependent on the integrity of the actin cytoskeleton, myosin, and intercellular adhesions interfacing adjacent cells. High magnification imaging revealed that keratin filaments became progressively stretched during extension, suggesting they participate in monolayer mechanics. This multiscale study of monolayer response to deformation enabled by our device provides the first quantitative investigation of the link between monolayer biology and mechanics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Topological defects in epithelia govern cell death and extrusion
Saw, T. B., Doostmohammadi, A., Nier, V., Kocgozlu, L., Thampi, S., Toyama, Y., Marcq, P., Lim, C. T., Yeomans, J. M., & Ladoux, B. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature21718 · Cited by 831
Vertex models: from cell mechanics to tissue morphogenesis
Alt, S., Ganguly, P., & Salbreux, G. (2017) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2015.0520 · Cited by 445
Investigating cell mechanics with atomic force microscopy
Haase, K., & Pelling, A. E. (2015) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2014.0970 · Cited by 396
Interplay of cell dynamics and epithelial tension during morphogenesis of the Drosophila pupal wing
Etournay, R., Popović, M., Merkel, M., Nandi, A., Blasse, C., Aigouy, B., Brandl, H., Myers, G., Salbreux, G., Jülicher, F., et al. (2015) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.07090 · Cited by 373
Adherens junctions as molecular regulators of emergent tissue mechanics
Campàs, O., Noordstra, I., & Yap, A. S. (2024) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-023-00688-7 · Cited by 149
Metadata
- Authors
- Harris, A. R., Peter, L., Bellis, J., Baum, B., Kabla, A. J., & Charras, G. T.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2012-09-18
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 41
- Pages
- 16449-16454
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2045429993
- Cited by
- 387
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characterizing the mechanics of cultured cell monolayers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1213301109
- The paper
- Harris, A. R., Peter, L., Bellis, J., Baum, B., Kabla, A. J., & Charras, G. T. (2012). Characterizing the mechanics of cultured cell monolayers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1213301109
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.