The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Frequency modulation entrains slow neural oscillations and optimizes human listening behavior
Open accessAbstract
The human ability to continuously track dynamic environmental stimuli, in particular speech, is proposed to profit from “entrainment” of endogenous neural oscillations, which involves phase reorganization such that “optimal” phase comes into line with temporally expected critical events, resulting in improved processing. The current experiment goes beyond previous work in this domain by addressing two thus far unanswered questions. First, how general is neural entrainment to environmental rhythms: Can neural oscillations be entrained by temporal dynamics of ongoing rhythmic stimuli without abrupt onsets? Second, does neural entrainment optimize performance of the perceptual system: Does human auditory perception benefit from neural phase reorganization? In a human electroencephalography study, listeners detected short gaps distributed uniformly with respect to the phase angle of a 3-Hz frequency-modulated stimulus. Listeners’ ability to detect gaps in the frequency-modulated sound was not uniformly distributed in time, but clustered in certain preferred phases of the modulation. Moreover, the optimal stimulus phase was individually determined by the neural delta oscillation entrained by the stimulus. Finally, delta phase predicted behavior better than stimulus phase or the event-related potential after the gap. This study demonstrates behavioral benefits of phase realignment in response to frequency-modulated auditory stimuli, overall suggesting that frequency fluctuations in natural environmental input provide a pacing signal for endogenous neural oscillations, thereby influencing perceptual processing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data
Maris, E., & Oostenveld, R. (2007) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.03.024 · Cited by 8,496
Neuronal Oscillations in Cortical Networks
Buzsáki, G., & Draguhn, A. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1099745 · Cited by 6,576
Entrainment of Neuronal Oscillations as a Mechanism of Attentional Selection
Lakatos, P., Karmos, G., Mehta, A. D., Ulbert, I., & Schroeder, C. E. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1154735 · Cited by 1,719
Cited by
A New Unifying Account of the Roles of Neuronal Entrainment
Lakatos, P., Gross, J., & Thut, G. (2019) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2019.07.075 · Cited by 508
Temporal modulations in speech and music
Ding, N., Patel, A. D., Chen, L., Butler, H., Luo, C., & Poeppel, D. (2017) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.02.011 · Cited by 502
Cortical entrainment to continuous speech: functional roles and interpretations
Ding, N., & Simon, J. Z. (2014) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00311 · Cited by 443
Transcranial Alternating Current and Random Noise Stimulation: Possible Mechanisms
Antal, A., & Herrmann, C. S. (2016) · Neural Plasticity · doi:10.1155/2016/3616807 · Cited by 357
Local Entrainment of Alpha Oscillations by Visual Stimuli Causes Cyclic Modulation of Perception
Spaak, E., de Lange, F. P., & Jensen, O. (2014) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4385-13.2014 · Cited by 349
Metadata
- Authors
- Henry, M. J., & Obleser, J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2012-11-14
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 49
- Pages
- 20095-20100
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2089267012
- Cited by
- 415
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 10.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Frequency modulation entrains slow neural oscillations and optimizes human listening behavior. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1213390109
- The paper
- Henry, M. J., & Obleser, J. (2012). Frequency modulation entrains slow neural oscillations and optimizes human listening behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1213390109
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.