The DOI matches its Crossref record; 76 of the 76 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Transcranial Alternating Current and Random Noise Stimulation: Possible Mechanisms
Open accessAbstract
Background. Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) is a relatively recent method suited to noninvasively modulate brain oscillations. Technically the method is similar but not identical to transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). While decades of research in animals and humans has revealed the main physiological mechanisms of tDCS, less is known about the physiological mechanisms of tACS.Method. Here, we review recent interdisciplinary research that has furthered our understanding of how tACS affects brain oscillations and by what means transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) that is a special form of tACS can modulate cortical functions.Results. Animal experiments have demonstrated in what way neurons react to invasively and transcranially applied alternating currents. Such findings are further supported by neural network simulations and knowledge from physics on entraining physical oscillators in the human brain. As a result, fine-grained models of the human skull and brain allow the prediction of the exact pattern of current flow during tDCS and tACS. Finally, recent studies on human physiology and behavior complete the picture of noninvasive modulation of brain oscillations.Conclusion. In future, the methods may be applicable in therapy of neurological and psychiatric disorders that are due to malfunctioning brain oscillations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nitsche, M. A., & Paulus, W. (2000) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00633.x · Cited by 5,656
Synchronization a universal concept in nonlinear sciences
PIKOVSKY, A. S., Rosenblum, M. G., & Kurths, J. (2001) · Cited by 5,640
Dynamic predictions: Oscillations and synchrony in top–down processing
Engel, A. K., Fries, P., & Singer, W. (2001) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/35094565 · Cited by 3,454
Neural synchrony in brain disorders: Relevance for cognitive dysfunctions and pathophysiology
Uhlhaas, P. J., & Singer, W. (2006) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.09.020 · Cited by 2,194
Boosting slow oscillations during sleep potentiates memory
Marshall, L., Helgadóttir, H., Mölle, M., & Born, J. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05278 · Cited by 1,792
Geddes, L. A., & Baker, L. E. (1967) · Medical & Biological Engineering · doi:10.1007/bf02474537 · Cited by 1,610
Storage of 7 +/- 2 short-term memories in oscillatory subcycles
Lisman, J. E., & Idiart, M. A. P. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7878473 · Cited by 1,471
Stochastic resonance and sensory information processing: A tutorial and review of application
Moss, F., Ward, L. M., & Sannita, W. G. (2004) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2003.09.014 · Cited by 994
Cross-frequency coupling between neuronal oscillations
Jensen, O., & Colgin, L. L. (2007) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.05.003 · Cited by 991
Bindman, L. J., Lippold, O. C. J., & Redfearn, J. W. T. (1964) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1964.sp007425 · Cited by 978
Cited by
Plasticity induced by non-invasive transcranial brain stimulation: a position paper
Huang, Y.-Z., Lu, M.-K., Antal, A., Classen, J., Nitsche, M., Ziemann, U., Ridding, M., Hamada, M., Ugawa, Y., Jaberzadeh, S., et al. (2017) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2017.09.007 · Cited by 401
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Antal, A., & Herrmann, C. S.
- Venue
- Neural Plasticity
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016
- Volume
- 2016
- Pages
- 1-12
- ISSN
- 1687-5443 (ISSN-L)
- 2090-5904
- OpenAlex
- W2345619594
- Cited by
- 357
- References
- 76
- FWCI
- 12.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transcranial Alternating Current and Random Noise Stimulation: Possible Mechanisms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1155/2016/3616807
- The paper
- Antal, A., & Herrmann, C. S. (2016). Transcranial Alternating Current and Random Noise Stimulation: Possible Mechanisms. Neural Plasticity. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3616807
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.