Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 555

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Historical changes in northeastern US bee pollinators related to shared ecological traits

Open access
Bartomeus, Ignasi, Ascher, John S., Gibbs, Jason, Danforth, Bryan N., Wagner, David L., Hedtke, Shannon M., Winfree, Rachael·2013·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Pollinators such as bees are essential to the functioning of terrestrial ecosystems. However, despite concerns about a global pollinator crisis, long-term data on the status of bee species are limited. We present a long-term study of relative rates of change for an entire regional bee fauna in the northeastern United States, based on >30,000 museum records representing 438 species. Over a 140-y period, aggregate native species richness weakly decreased, but richness declines were significant only for the genus Bombus. Of 187 native species analyzed individually, only three declined steeply, all of these in the genus Bombus. However, there were large shifts in community composition, as indicated by 56% of species showing significant changes in relative abundance over time. Traits associated with a declining relative abundance include small dietary and phenological breadth and large body size. In addition, species with lower latitudinal range boundaries are increasing in relative abundance, a finding that may represent a response to climate change. We show that despite marked increases in human population density and large changes in anthropogenic land use, aggregate native species richness declines were modest outside of the genus Bombus. At the same time, we find that certain ecological traits are associated with declines in relative abundance. These results should help target conservation efforts focused on maintaining native bee abundance and diversity and therefore the important ecosystems services that they provide.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1218503110

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 40 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. JC Grixti, L Packer, Changes in the bee fauna (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) of an old field site in southern Ontario, revisited after 34 years. Can Entomol 138, 147–164 (2006). · doi:10.4039/n05-034
  2. SR Colla, et al., Documenting persistence of most eastern North American bee species (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Anthophila) to 1990-2009. J Kans Entomol Soc 85, 14–22 (2012). · doi:10.2317/jkes110726.1
  3. KC Matteson, JS Ascher, GA Langellotto, Bee richness and abundance in New York city urban gardens. Ann Entomol Soc Am 101, 140–150 (2008). · doi:10.1603/0013-8746(2008)101[140:braain]2.0.co;2
  4. RT Schuh, S Hewson-Smith, JS Ascher, Specimen databases: A case study in entomology using web-based software. Am. Entomologist 56, 206–216 (2010). · doi:10.1093/ae/56.4.206

Cited by

See all 555

Metadata

Authors
Bartomeus, I., Ascher, J. S., Gibbs, J., Danforth, B. N., Wagner, D. L., Hedtke, S. M., & Winfree, R.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2013-03-04
Volume
110
Issue
12
Pages
4656-4660
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2064071430
Cited by
555
References
40
FWCI
39.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Historical changes in northeastern US bee pollinators related to shared ecological traits. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1218503110
The paper
Bartomeus, I., Ascher, J. S., Gibbs, J., Danforth, B. N., Wagner, D. L., Hedtke, S. M., & Winfree, R. (2013). Historical changes in northeastern US bee pollinators related to shared ecological traits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1218503110

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.