Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,597

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The material footprint of nations

Open access
Wiedmann, Thomas O., Schandl, Heinz, Lenzen, Manfred, Moran, Daniel, Suh, Sangwon, West, James, Kanemoto, Keiichiro·2015·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Metrics on resource productivity currently used by governments suggest that some developed countries have increased the use of natural resources at a slower rate than economic growth (relative decoupling) or have even managed to use fewer resources over time (absolute decoupling). Using the material footprint (MF), a consumption-based indicator of resource use, we find the contrary: Achievements in decoupling in advanced economies are smaller than reported or even nonexistent. We present a time series analysis of the MF of 186 countries and identify material flows associated with global production and consumption networks in unprecedented specificity. By calculating raw material equivalents of international trade, we demonstrate that countries’ use of nondomestic resources is, on average, about threefold larger than the physical quantity of traded goods. As wealth grows, countries tend to reduce their domestic portion of materials extraction through international trade, whereas the overall mass of material consumption generally increases. With every 10% increase in gross domestic product, the average national MF increases by 6%. Our findings call into question the sole use of current resource productivity indicators in policy making and suggest the necessity of an additional focus on consumption-based accounting for natural resource use.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1220362110

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 60

  1. ; European Commission Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe. COM(2011)571 Final (European Commission, Brussels, 2011).
  2. ; National Research Council Minerals, Critical Minerals, and the U.S. Economy (National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2008).
  3. ; Eurostat Sustainable Development Indicators (Statistical Office of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 2012).
  4. ; OECD Towards Green Growth: Monitoring Progress (OECD Indicators) (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, 2011).
  5. ; UNEP Decoupling Natural Resource Use and Environmental Impacts from Economic Growth (United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi, 2011).
  6. S Bringezu, R Bleischwitz Sustainable Resource Management—Global Trends, Visions and Policies (Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield, U.K, 2009).
  7. ; Eurostat Eurostat Material Flow Accounts Dataset: Resource Productivity (Statistical Office of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 2012).
  8. ; OECD Resource Productivity in the G8 and the OECD—A Report in the Framework of the Kobe 3R Action Plan (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, 2011).
  9. 10.1073/pnas.0906974107 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1021/es803496a · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1080/09535311003612591 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.04.006 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.12.010 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1021/es301949t · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1080/09535314.2011.638276 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.06.018 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.017 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1038/nature11145 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.4155/cmt.10.1 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.04.023 · DOI
  21. M Dittrich, S Giljum, S Lutter, C Polzin Green Economies Around the World? Implications of Resource Use for Development and the Environment (Sustainable Europe Research Institute, Vienna, 2012).
  22. 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2008.00065.x · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.05.007 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.06.003 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.08.016 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.12.009 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.014 · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.014
  28. 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2009.00154.x · doi:10.1111/j.1530-9290.2009.00154.x
  29. 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2009.00144.x · DOI
  30. 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00378.x · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.03.011 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00504.x · doi:10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00504.x
  33. 10.1016/j.envsci.2013.01.005 · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2013.01.005
  34. 10.1021/es300434c · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.020 · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.020
  36. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.02.013 · DOI · Paper page
  37. ; Eurostat Economy-Wide Material Flow Accounts and Derived Indicators. A Methodological Guide (Statistical Office of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 2001).
  38. ; Eurostat Economy-Wide Material Flow Accounts (EW-MFA): Compilation Guidelines for Eurostat’s 2011 EW-MFA Questionnaire (Statistical Office of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 2011).
  39. 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00366.x · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1021/es300171x · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.04.010 · DOI
  42. 10.1073/pnas.1006388108 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00420.x · DOI
  44. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.03.004 · DOI
  45. 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00404.x · DOI
  46. 10.1021/es1028537 · DOI
  47. 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2009.00163.x · DOI
  48. 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2008.00072.x · DOI
  49. 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2008.00088.x · DOI
  50. 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2008.00097.x · doi:10.1111/j.1530-9290.2008.00097.x
  51. 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.06.060 · DOI
  52. 10.1016/j.energy.2005.01.009 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.05.012 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1016/S1366-7017(01)00072-1 · DOI
  55. 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2009.00177.x · DOI
  56. 10.1021/es102273t · DOI
  57. 10.1016/j.envsci.2007.07.005 · DOI
  58. 10.1007/s10368-010-0170-z · DOI
  59. 10.1073/pnas.0806099105 · DOI
  60. 10.2307/1926294 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 1,597

Metadata

Authors
Wiedmann, T. O., Schandl, H., Lenzen, M., Moran, D., Suh, S., West, J., & Kanemoto, K.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2013-09-03
Volume
112
Issue
20
Pages
6271-6276
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2045987553
Cited by
1,597
References
2
FWCI
58.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The material footprint of nations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1220362110
The paper
Wiedmann, T. O., Schandl, H., Lenzen, M., Moran, D., Suh, S., West, J., & Kanemoto, K. (2015). The material footprint of nations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1220362110

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.