The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The material footprint of nations
Open accessAbstract
Metrics on resource productivity currently used by governments suggest that some developed countries have increased the use of natural resources at a slower rate than economic growth (relative decoupling) or have even managed to use fewer resources over time (absolute decoupling). Using the material footprint (MF), a consumption-based indicator of resource use, we find the contrary: Achievements in decoupling in advanced economies are smaller than reported or even nonexistent. We present a time series analysis of the MF of 186 countries and identify material flows associated with global production and consumption networks in unprecedented specificity. By calculating raw material equivalents of international trade, we demonstrate that countries’ use of nondomestic resources is, on average, about threefold larger than the physical quantity of traded goods. As wealth grows, countries tend to reduce their domestic portion of materials extraction through international trade, whereas the overall mass of material consumption generally increases. With every 10% increase in gross domestic product, the average national MF increases by 6%. Our findings call into question the sole use of current resource productivity indicators in policy making and suggest the necessity of an additional focus on consumption-based accounting for natural resource use.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
System Boundary Selection in Life-Cycle Inventories Using Hybrid Approaches
Suh, S., Lenzen, M., Treloar, G. J., Hondo, H., Horvath, A., Huppes, G., Jolliet, O., Klann, U., Krewitt, W., Moriguchi, Y., et al. (2004) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es0263745 · Cited by 1,025
Self-citationKrausmann, F., Erb, K.-H., Gingrich, S., Lauk, C., & Haberl, H. (2008) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.012 · Cited by 380
Research works printed but not linked: 60
- ; European Commission Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe. COM(2011)571 Final (European Commission, Brussels, 2011).
- ; National Research Council Minerals, Critical Minerals, and the U.S. Economy (National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2008).
- ; Eurostat Sustainable Development Indicators (Statistical Office of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 2012).
- ; OECD Towards Green Growth: Monitoring Progress (OECD Indicators) (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, 2011).
- ; UNEP Decoupling Natural Resource Use and Environmental Impacts from Economic Growth (United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi, 2011).
- S Bringezu, R Bleischwitz Sustainable Resource Management—Global Trends, Visions and Policies (Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield, U.K, 2009).
- ; Eurostat Eurostat Material Flow Accounts Dataset: Resource Productivity (Statistical Office of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 2012).
- ; OECD Resource Productivity in the G8 and the OECD—A Report in the Framework of the Kobe 3R Action Plan (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, 2011).
- 10.1073/pnas.0906974107 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/es803496a · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/09535311003612591 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.04.006 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.12.010 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/es301949t · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/09535314.2011.638276 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.06.018 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.017 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature11145 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.4155/cmt.10.1 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.04.023 · DOI
- M Dittrich, S Giljum, S Lutter, C Polzin Green Economies Around the World? Implications of Resource Use for Development and the Environment (Sustainable Europe Research Institute, Vienna, 2012).
- 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2008.00065.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.05.007 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.06.003 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.08.016 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.12.009 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.014 · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.014
- 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2009.00154.x · doi:10.1111/j.1530-9290.2009.00154.x
- 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2009.00144.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00378.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.03.011 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00504.x · doi:10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00504.x
- 10.1016/j.envsci.2013.01.005 · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2013.01.005
- 10.1021/es300434c · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.020 · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.020
- 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.02.013 · DOI · Paper page
- ; Eurostat Economy-Wide Material Flow Accounts and Derived Indicators. A Methodological Guide (Statistical Office of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 2001).
- ; Eurostat Economy-Wide Material Flow Accounts (EW-MFA): Compilation Guidelines for Eurostat’s 2011 EW-MFA Questionnaire (Statistical Office of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 2011).
- 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00366.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/es300171x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.04.010 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1006388108 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00420.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.03.004 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00404.x · DOI
- 10.1021/es1028537 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2009.00163.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2008.00072.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2008.00088.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2008.00097.x · doi:10.1111/j.1530-9290.2008.00097.x
- 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.06.060 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.energy.2005.01.009 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.05.012 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S1366-7017(01)00072-1 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2009.00177.x · DOI
- 10.1021/es102273t · DOI
- 10.1016/j.envsci.2007.07.005 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10368-010-0170-z · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0806099105 · DOI
- 10.2307/1926294 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Hickel, J., & Kallis, G. (2020) · New Political Economy · doi:10.1080/13563467.2019.1598964 · Cited by 2,007
A good life for all within planetary boundaries
O’Neill, D. W., Fanning, A. L., Lamb, W. F., & Steinberger, J. K. (2018) · Nature Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s41893-018-0021-4 · Cited by 1,452
Future threats to biodiversity and pathways to their prevention
Tilman, D., Clark, M., Williams, D. R., Kimmel, K., Polasky, S., & Packer, C. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature22900 · Cited by 1,341
Principles for a sustainable circular economy
Velenturf, A. P. M., & Purnell, P. (2021) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2021.02.018 · Cited by 1,350
Scientists’ warning on affluence
Wiedmann, T., Lenzen, M., Keyßer, L. T., & Steinberger, J. K. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y · Cited by 1,085
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wiedmann, T. O., Schandl, H., Lenzen, M., Moran, D., Suh, S., West, J., & Kanemoto, K.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2013-09-03
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 6271-6276
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2045987553
- Cited by
- 1,597
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 58.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2023-12-08)
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The material footprint of nations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1220362110
- The paper
- Wiedmann, T. O., Schandl, H., Lenzen, M., Moran, D., Suh, S., West, J., & Kanemoto, K. (2015). The material footprint of nations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1220362110
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.