The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neural predictors of individual differences in response to math tutoring in primary-grade school children
Open accessAbstract
Now, more than ever, the ability to acquire mathematical skills efficiently is critical for academic and professional success, yet little is known about the behavioral and neural mechanisms that drive some children to acquire these skills faster than others. Here we investigate the behavioral and neural predictors of individual differences in arithmetic skill acquisition in response to 8-wk of one-to-one math tutoring. Twenty-four children in grade 3 (ages 8–9 y), a critical period for acquisition of basic mathematical skills, underwent structural and resting-state functional MRI scans pretutoring. A significant shift in arithmetic problem-solving strategies from counting to fact retrieval was observed with tutoring. Notably, the speed and accuracy of arithmetic problem solving increased with tutoring, with some children improving significantly more than others. Next, we examined whether pretutoring behavioral and brain measures could predict individual differences in arithmetic performance improvements with tutoring. No behavioral measures, including intelligence quotient, working memory, or mathematical abilities, predicted performance improvements. In contrast, pretutoring hippocampal volume predicted performance improvements. Furthermore, pretutoring intrinsic functional connectivity of the hippocampus with dorsolateral and ventrolateral prefrontal cortices and the basal ganglia also predicted performance improvements. Our findings provide evidence that individual differences in morphometry and connectivity of brain regions associated with learning and memory, and not regions typically involved in arithmetic processing, are strong predictors of responsiveness to math tutoring in children. More generally, our study suggests that quantitative measures of brain structure and intrinsic brain organization can provide a more sensitive marker of skill acquisition than behavioral measures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Squire, L. R., Stark, C. E. L., & Clark, R. E. (2004) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144130 · Cited by 2,680
Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achievement
Halberda, J., Mazzocco, M. M. M., & Feigenson, L. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07246 · Cited by 1,459
Early math matters: Kindergarten number competence and later mathematics outcomes.
Jordan, N. C., Kaplan, D., Ramineni, C., & Locuniak, M. N. (2009) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0014939 · Cited by 1,133
Interactive memory systems in the human brain
Poldrack, R. A., Clark, J., Paré-Blagoev, E. J., Shohamy, D., Creso Moyano, J., Myers, C., & Gluck, M. A. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35107080 · Cited by 1,132
Development of Numerical Estimation in Young Children
Siegler, R. S., & Booth, J. L. (2004) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00684.x · Cited by 1,011
Prefrontal and medial temporal lobe interactions in long-term memory
Simons, J. S., & Spiers, H. J. (2003) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1178 · Cited by 961
Howlin, P. (1986) · Early Human Development · doi:10.1016/0378-3782(86)90107-6 · Cited by 857
Cognitive predictors of achievement growth in mathematics: A 5-year longitudinal study.
Geary, D. C. (2011) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0025510 · Cited by 836
Rivera, S. M., Reiss, A. L., Eckert, M. A., & Menon, V. (2005) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhi055 · Cited by 620
Self-citationGeary, D. C., Hoard, M. K., Byrd-Craven, J., & Catherine DeSoto, M. (2004) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2004.03.002 · Cited by 575
Cited by
Hippocampal-neocortical functional reorganization underlies children's cognitive development
Qin, S., Cho, S., Chen, T., Rosenberg-Lee, M., Geary, D. C., & Menon, V. (2014) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3788 · Cited by 275
Self-citationRemediation of childhood math anxiety and associated neural circuits through cognitive tutoring
Supekar, K., Iuculano, T., Chen, L., & Menon, V. (2015) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0786-15.2015 · Cited by 187
Self-citationResting-state cortical connectivity predicts motor skill acquisition
Wu, J., Srinivasan, R., Kaur, A., & Cramer, S. C. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.01.026 · Cited by 150
“61, (Supekar et al., 2013)), performance on an associative memory task (R(2) = 0.”
InfluentialAdvanced MRI techniques to improve our understanding of experience-induced neuroplasticity
Tardif, C. L., Gauthier, C. J., Steele, C. J., Bazin, P.-L., Schäfer, A., Schaefer, A., Turner, R., & Villringer, A. (2016) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.08.047 · Cited by 127
Sun, J., Chen, Q., Zhang, Q., Li, Y., Li, H., Wei, D., Yang, W., & Qiu, J. (2016) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.23246 · Cited by 122
Metadata
- Authors
- Supekar, K., Swigart, A. G., Tenison, C., Jolles, D. D., Rosenberg-Lee, M., Fuchs, L., & Menon, V.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2013-04-29
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 8230-8235
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2010654743
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 56
- FWCI
- 21.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neural predictors of individual differences in response to math tutoring in primary-grade school children. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1222154110
- The paper
- Supekar, K., Swigart, A. G., Tenison, C., Jolles, D. D., Rosenberg-Lee, M., Fuchs, L., & Menon, V. (2013). Neural predictors of individual differences in response to math tutoring in primary-grade school children. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1222154110
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.