Cited by 152

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An atmospheric p CO 2 reconstruction across the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary from leaf megafossils

Beerling, D. J., Lomax, B. H., Royer, D. L., Upchurch, G. R., Kump, L. R.·2002·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The end-Cretaceous mass extinctions, 65 million years ago, profoundly influenced the course of biotic evolution. These extinctions coincided with a major extraterrestrial impact event and massive volcanism in India. Determining the relative importance of each event as a driver of environmental and biotic change across the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary (KTB) crucially depends on constraining the mass of CO 2 injected into the atmospheric carbon reservoir. Using the inverse relationship between atmospheric CO 2 and the stomatal index of land plant leaves, we reconstruct Late Cretaceous-Early Tertiary atmospheric CO 2 concentration ( p CO 2 ) levels with special emphasis on providing a p CO 2 estimate directly above the KTB. Our record shows stable Late Cretaceous/Early Tertiary background p CO 2 levels of 350–500 ppm by volume, but with a marked increase to at least 2,300 ppm by volume within 10,000 years of the KTB. Numerical simulations with a global biogeochemical carbon cycle model indicate that CO 2 outgassing during the eruption of the Deccan Trap basalts fails to fully account for the inferred p CO 2 increase. Instead, we calculate that the postboundary p CO 2 rise is most consistent with the instantaneous transfer of ≈4,600 Gt C from the lithic to the atmospheric reservoir by a large extraterrestrial bolide impact. A resultant climatic forcing of +12 W⋅m −2 would have been sufficient to warm the Earth's surface by ≈7.5°C, in the absence of counter forcing by sulfate aerosols. This finding reinforces previous evidence for major climatic warming after the KTB impact and implies that severe and abrupt global warming during the earliest Paleocene was an important factor in biotic extinction at the KTB.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.122573099

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. 10.1126/science.216.4543.249 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/0012-821X(86)90118-4 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1038/326143a0 · DOI
  4. 10.1126/science.208.4448.1095 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1038/37291 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1038/338247a0 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1016/S0012-8252(00)00042-8 · DOI
  8. 10.1038/324148a0 · DOI
  9. 10.1073/pnas.84.15.5096 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/0921-8181(92)90009-Y · DOI
  11. C L Pillmore, D J Nichols, R F Fleming Colorado and Adjacent Areas, eds D R Lageson, A P Lester, B D Trudgill (Geol. Soc. Am., Boulder, CO), pp. 135–155 (1999).
  12. H Kerps, M Krings Fossil Plants and Spores: Modern Techniques, eds T P Jones, N P Rowe (Geol. Soc. London, London), pp. 52–56 (1999).
  13. D J Beerling Fossil Plants and Spores: Modern Techniques, eds T P Jones, N P Rowe (Geol. Soc. London, London), pp. 251–256 (1999).
  14. 10.1126/science.292.5525.2310 · DOI
  15. 10.1046/j.0028-646X.2001.00335.x · DOI
  16. 10.2475/ajs.301.2.182 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.2475/ajs.287.8.763 · DOI
  18. 10.1130/0091-7613(1991)019<0299:ICIESO>2.3.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.2475/ajs.299.10.805 · DOI
  20. 10.1126/science.291.5510.1952 · DOI
  21. 10.1126/science.282.5387.276 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/S0012-821X(00)00159-X · DOI
  23. 10.1029/97JE01743 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1016/S0012-821X(98)00263-5 · DOI
  25. 10.1029/98JE02496 · DOI
  26. 10.1029/96JE02266 · DOI
  27. 10.1073/pnas.170278997 · DOI
  28. 10.1038/360573a0 · DOI
  29. 10.1029/1999PA900022 · DOI
  30. 10.1038/343153a0 · DOI
  31. 10.1038/337061a0 · DOI
  32. 10.1038/35097000 · DOI
  33. 10.1130/0016-7606(1991)103<1439:HCACTB>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
  34. Hicks J. F. Johnson K. R. Tauxe L. Clark D. & Obradovich J. D. (2002) Geol. Soc. Am. Spec. Pap. in press.
  35. 10.1016/0031-0182(94)00109-L · DOI
  36. R G H Raynolds, K R Johnson, L R Arnold, T M Farnham, R F Flemming, J F Hicks, S A Kelley, L A Lapey, D J Nichols, J D Obradovich, M D Wilson The Kiowa Core, A Continuous Drill Core Through the Denver Basin Bedrock Aquifiers at Kiowa, Elbert County Colorado, U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 01–185, . (2000).
  37. Z Kvaĉek, S B Manum, M C Boulter Palaeontographica B 232, 103–128 (1994).
  38. 10.1111/j.1502-3931.1968.tb01728.x · DOI

Cited by

See all 152

Metadata

Authors
Beerling, D. J., Lomax, B. H., Royer, D. L., Upchurch, G. R., & Kump, L. R.
Affiliations
Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, United Kingdom; Department of Biology, Southwest Texas State University, San Marcos, TX 78666; and Department of Geosciences and Astrobiology Research Center, 535 Deike Building, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2002-06-11
Volume
99
Issue
12
Pages
7836-7840
ISSN
  • 0027-8424
  • 1091-6490
Cited by
152
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review