The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Large-scale comparison of intron positions in mammalian genes shows intron loss but no gain
Open accessAbstract
We compared intron–exon structures in 1,560 human–mouse orthologs and 360 mouse–rat orthologs. The origin of differences in intron positions between species was inferred by comparison with an outgroup, Fugu for human–mouse and human for mouse–rat. Among 10,020 intron positions in the human–mouse comparison, we found unequivocal evidence for five independent intron losses in the mouse lineage but no evidence for intron loss in humans or for intron gain in either lineage. Among 1,459 positions in rat–mouse comparisons, we found evidence for one loss in rat but neither loss in mouse nor gain in either lineage. In each case, the intron losses were exact, without change in the surrounding coding sequence, and involved introns that are extremely short, with an average of 200 bp, an order of magnitude shorter than the mammalian average. These results favor a model whereby introns are lost through gene conversion with intronless copies of the gene. In addition, the finding of widespread conservation of intron–exon structure, even over large evolutionary distances, suggests that comparative methods employing information about gene structures should be very successful in correctly predicting exon boundaries in genomic sequences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology
Wheeler, D. L. (2003) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkg033 · Cited by 1,109
The Genome Sequence of Caenorhabditis briggsae: A Platform for Comparative Genomics
Stein, L. D., Bao, Z., Blasiar, D., Blumenthal, T., Brent, M. R., Chen, N., Chinwalla, A., Clarke, L., Clee, C., Coghlan, A., et al. (2003) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0000045 · Cited by 940
The evolution of spliceosomal introns: patterns, puzzles and progress
William Roy, S., & Gilbert, W. (2006) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1807 · Cited by 648
Self-citationThe biology of intron gain and loss
Jeffares, D. C., Mourier, T., & Penny, D. (2006) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2005.10.006 · Cited by 296
Atlantic Salmon Interferon Genes: Cloning, Sequence Analysis, Expression, and Biological Activity
Robertsen, B., Bergan, V., Røkenes, T., Larsen, R., & Albuquerque, A. (2003) · Journal of Interferon & Cytokine Research · doi:10.1089/107999003322485107 · Cited by 261
Metadata
- Authors
- Roy, S. W., Fedorov, A., & Gilbert, W.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2003-05-30
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 7158-7162
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2113922914
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Large-scale comparison of intron positions in mammalian genes shows intron loss but no gain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1232297100
- The paper
- Roy, S. W., Fedorov, A., & Gilbert, W. (2003). Large-scale comparison of intron positions in mammalian genes shows intron loss but no gain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1232297100
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.