Cited by 928Bacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyGene Regulatory Network AnalysisCRISPR and Genetic Engineering

Exploring the sequence space for tetracycline-dependent transcriptional activators: Novel mutations yield expanded range and sensitivity

Open access
Urlinger, Stefanie, Baron, Udo, Thellmann, Marion, Hasan, Mazahir T., Bujard, Hermann, Hillen, Wolfgang·2000·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Regulatory elements that control tetracycline resistance in Escherichia coli were previously converted into highly specific transcription regulation systems that function in a wide variety of eukaryotic cells. One tetracycline repressor (TetR) mutant gave rise to rtTA, a tetracycline-controlled transactivator that requires doxycycline (Dox) for binding to tet operators and thus for the activation of P tet promoters. Despite the intriguing properties of rtTA, its use was limited, particularly in transgenic animals, because of its relatively inefficient inducibility by doxycycline in some organs, its instability, and its residual affinity to tetO in absence of Dox, leading to elevated background activities of the target promoter. To remove these limitations, we have mutagenized tTA DNA and selected in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for rtTA mutants with reduced basal activity and increased Dox sensitivity. Five new rtTAs were identified, of which two have greatly improved properties. The most promising new transactivator, rtTA2 S -M2, functions at a 10-fold lower Dox concentration than rtTA, is more stable in eukaryotic cells, and causes no background expression in the absence of Dox. The coding sequences of the new reverse TetR mutants fused to minimal activation domains were optimized for expression in human cells and synthesized. The resulting transactivators allow stringent regulation of target genes over a range of 4 to 5 orders of magnitude in stably transfected HeLa cells. These rtTA versions combine tightness of expression control with a broad regulatory range, as previously shown for the widely applied tTA.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.130192197

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Random mutagenesis of tTA followed by a functional screen for the reverse, dox-inducible phenotype in S. cerevisiae resulted in rtTA-S2, with 4 amino acid substitutions in the TetR domain; two mutations (E19G and A56P) reversed the phenotype, while D148E and H179R enhanced activity.

    “Random mutagenesis of tTA followed by a functional screen for the reverse, dox-inducible phenotype in the yeast S. cerevisiae resulted in a novel rtTA variant, rtTA-S2, with 4 amino acid substitutions in the TetR domain [15] (Fig. 2). Two of the selected mutations (E19G in the DBD and A56P in the helix connecting the DBD with the core) were shown to reverse the phenotype, whereas the other”

    From Tet-On Systems For Doxycycline-inducible Gene Expression (2016) · cites this paper as [15]

  • A second round of mutagenesis and screening in S. cerevisiae yielded an additional DBD mutation (S12G) that increased the activity of rtTA-S2, in particular at low dox concentrations.

    “A second round of mutagenesis and screening in S. cerevisiae yielded an additional DBD mutation (S12G) that increased the activity of rtTA-S2, in particular at low dox concentrations.”

    From Tet-On Systems For Doxycycline-inducible Gene Expression (2016) · cites this paper as [15]

  • The rtTA2S-S2 and rtTA2S-M2 variants demonstrated increased stability and reduced background activity in the absence of dox when compared with the original rtTA.

    “These studies resulted in the rtTA2S-S2 and rtTA2S-M2 variants that demonstrated increased stability and reduced background activity in the absence of dox when compared with the original rtTA.”

    From Tet-On Systems For Doxycycline-inducible Gene Expression (2016) · cites this paper as [15]

  • The rtTA2S-M2 variant demonstrated the highest sensitivity toward dox and functioned at a 10-fold lower dox concentration than the original rtTA and rtTA-S2.

    “The rtTA2S-M2 variant (a.k.a. Tet-On Advanced, Clontech) demonstrated the highest sensitivity toward dox and functioned at a 10-fold lower dox concentration than the original rtTA and rtTA-S2.”

    From Tet-On Systems For Doxycycline-inducible Gene Expression (2016) · cites this paper as [15]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. [1]Hillen W, Berens C. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1994;48:345–369. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.48.100194.002021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  2. [2]Degenkolb J, Takahashi M, Ellestad G A, Hillen W. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991;35:1591–1595. doi: 10.1128/aac.35.8.1591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  3. [4]Baron U, Gossen M, Bujard H. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:2723–2729. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.14.2723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  4. [5]Hinrichs W, Kisker C, Duvel M, Müller A, Tovar K, Hillen W, Saenger W. Science. 1994;264:418–420. doi: 10.1126/science.8153629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  5. [6]Orth P, Cordes F, Schnappinger D, Hillen W, Saenger W, Hinrichs W. J Mol Biol. 1998;279:439–447. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1998.1775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  6. [8]Baron, U. & Bujard, H. (2000) Methods Enzymol., in press. [DOI] [PubMed]
  7. [9]Kistner A, Gossen M, Zimmermann F, Jerecic J, Ullmer C, Lübbert H, Bujard H. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:10933–10938. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.20.10933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  8. [10]Scholz O, Thiel A, Hillen W, Niederweis M. Eur J Biochem. 2000;267:1565–1570. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1327.2000.01170.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  9. [11]Garí E, Piedrafita L, Aldea M, Herrero E. Yeast. 1997;13:837–848. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(199707)13:9<837::AID-YEA145>3.0.CO;2-T. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  10. [12]Pan W, Ravot E, Tolle R, Frank R, Mosbach R, Türbachova I, Bujard H. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999;27:1094–1103. doi: 10.1093/nar/27.4.1094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  11. [13]Leung D W, Chen C, Goeddel D V. Technique. 1989;1:11–15. [Google Scholar]
  12. [14]Gietz R D, Schiestl R H, Willems A R, Woods R A. Yeast. 1995;11:355–360. doi: 10.1002/yea.320110408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  13. [15]Rose A B, Broach J R. Methods Enzymol. 1990;185:234–279. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(90)85024-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  14. [16]Miller J H. Experiments in Molecular Genetics. Plainview, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Lab. Press; 1972. [Google Scholar]
  15. [17]Freundlieb S, Schirra-Müller C, Bujard H. J Gene Med. 1999;1:4–12. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-2254(199901/02)1:1<4::AID-JGM4>3.0.CO;2-Y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  16. [18]Niedenthal R K, Riles L, Johnston M, Hegemann J H. Yeast. 1996;12:773–786. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(19960630)12:8%3C773::AID-YEA972%3E3.0.CO;2-L. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  17. [19]Baron U, Schnappinger D, Helbl V, Gossen M, Hillen W, Bujard H. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:1013–1018. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.3.1013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  18. [20]Baron U. Ph.D. thesis. Heidelberg, Germany: Universität Heidelberg; 1998. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Urlinger, S., Baron, U., Thellmann, M., Hasan, M. T., Bujard, H., & Hillen, W.
Affiliations
Heidelberg University (DE)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2000-06-20
Volume
97
Issue
14
Pages
7963-7968
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2150712887
Cited by
928
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 46
FWCI
22.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Keywords
tetracycline-controlled transactivator, rtTA, TetR repressor, doxycycline induction, transcriptional regulation, tetracycline resistance, mutagenesis, protein stability, synthetic promoters, HeLa cells
MeSH terms
Anti-Bacterial Agents, Bacterial Proteins, Carrier Proteins, Doxycycline, HeLa Cells, Humans, Mutation, Repressor Proteins, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Tetracyclines, Trans-Activators

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review