Cited by 193Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

GABA promotes the competitive selection of dendritic spines by controlling local Ca2+ signaling

Open access
Hayama, Tatsuya, Noguchi, Jun, Watanabe, Satoshi, Takahashi, Noriko, Hayashi-Takagi, Akiko, Ellis-Davies, Graham C R, Matsuzaki, Masanori, Kasai, Haruo·2013·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

Activity-dependent competition of synapses plays a key role in neural organization and is often promoted by GABA; however, its cellular bases are poorly understood. Excitatory synapses of cortical pyramidal neurons are formed on small protrusions known as dendritic spines, which exhibit structural plasticity. We used two-color uncaging of glutamate and GABA in rat hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons and found that spine shrinkage and elimination were markedly promoted by the activation of GABAA receptors shortly before action potentials. GABAergic inhibition suppressed bulk increases in cytosolic Ca2+ concentrations, whereas it preserved the Ca2+ nanodomains generated by NMDA-type receptors, both of which were necessary for spine shrinkage. Unlike spine enlargement, spine shrinkage spread to neighboring spines (<15 μm) and competed with their enlargement, and this process involved the actin-depolymerizing factor ADF/cofilin. Thus, GABAergic inhibition directly suppresses local dendritic Ca2+ transients and strongly promotes the competitive selection of dendritic spines.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nn.3496

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The primary effect of sleep might be to reduce overall network activity and connectivity at excitatory synapses by increasing inhibition, pushing cortical E-I balance toward increased synaptic inhibition.

    “The primary effect of sleep might well be to reduce overall network activity, and connectivity at excitatory synapses 233 by increasing inhibition, i.e., by pushing the cortical E-I balance toward increased synaptic inhibition.”

    From Sleep—A brain-state serving systems memory consolidation (2023) · cites this paper as [233]

    The Results (Spine shrinkage by two-color glutamate and GABA uncaging; page unavailable) report GABA-associated spine shrinkage, elimination, and reduced glutamate sensitivity, supporting a local mechanism for weakening excitatory connections. The paper does not examine sleep or establish that sleep reduces overall network activity or shifts cortical excitation–inhibition balance toward inhibition. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Exogenous cofilins diffused along a dendrite and induced the spreading of spine shrinkage, similar to that induced by LFS or spike-timing dependent induction.

    “These experiments indicate that exogenous cofilins diffused along a dendrite and induced the spreading of spine shrinkage, similar to that induced by LFS (Supplementary Fig. S1) or spike-timing dependent induction9.”
  • Spine shrinkage tends to spread, as in LTD.

    “It has been reported that spine shrinkage tends to spread919 as in the case with LTD202122.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hayama, T., Noguchi, J., Watanabe, S., Takahashi, N., Hayashi-Takagi, A., Ellis-Davies, G. C. R., Matsuzaki, M., & Kasai, H.
Affiliations
  • Japan Science and Technology Agency (JP)
  • National Institute for Basic Biology (JP)
Corresponding author
Kasai, Haruo
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2013-08-25
Volume
16
Issue
10
Pages
1409-1416
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W2063856415
Cited by
193
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 1
FWCI
9.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (23300148, 24116001, 24116003, 21000009)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM 53395, R01GM053395)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS069720, NS69720)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
GABA, dendritic spines, synaptic competition, GABAA receptor, NMDA receptor, calcium nanodomains, calcium signaling, ADF/cofilin, actin cytoskeleton, glutamate uncaging, CA1 pyramidal neurons, synaptic plasticity, dendritic calcium transients
MeSH terms
Animals, Female, gamma-Aminobutyric Acid, Hippocampus, Male, Organ Culture Techniques, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Calcium Signaling, Dendritic Spines, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review