Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 271

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Highly penetrative, drug-loaded nanocarriers improve treatment of glioblastoma

Open access
Zhou, Jiangbing, Patel, Toral R., Sirianni, Rachael W., Strohbehn, Garth, Zheng, Ming-Qiang, Duong, Nha, Schafbauer, Thomas, Huttner, Anita J., Huang, Yiyun, Carson, Richard E., Zhang, Ying, Sullivan, David J., Piepmeier, Joseph M., Saltzman, W. Mark·2013·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Current therapy for glioblastoma multiforme is insufficient, with nearly universal recurrence. Available drug therapies are unsuccessful because they fail to penetrate through the region of the brain containing tumor cells and they fail to kill the cells most responsible for tumor development and therapy resistance, brain cancer stem cells (BCSCs). To address these challenges, we combined two major advances in technology: ( i ) brain-penetrating polymeric nanoparticles that can be loaded with drugs and are optimized for intracranial convection-enhanced delivery and ( ii ) repurposed compounds, previously used in Food and Drug Administration-approved products, which were identified through library screening to target BCSCs. Using fluorescence imaging and positron emission tomography, we demonstrate that brain-penetrating nanoparticles can be delivered to large intracranial volumes in both rats and pigs. We identified several agents (from Food and Drug Administration-approved products) that potently inhibit proliferation and self-renewal of BCSCs. When loaded into brain-penetrating nanoparticles and administered by convection-enhanced delivery, one of these agents, dithiazanine iodide, significantly increased survival in rats bearing BCSC-derived xenografts. This unique approach to controlled delivery in the brain should have a significant impact on treatment of glioblastoma multiforme and suggests previously undescribed routes for drug and gene delivery to treat other diseases of the central nervous system.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1304504110

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 271

Metadata

Authors
Zhou, J., Patel, T. R., Sirianni, R. W., Strohbehn, G., Zheng, M.-Q., Duong, N., Schafbauer, T., Huttner, A. J., Huang, Y., Carson, R. E., Zhang, Y., Sullivan, D. J., Piepmeier, J. M., & Saltzman, W. M.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2013-07
Volume
110
Issue
29
Pages
11751-11756
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2111498289
Cited by
271
References
7
FWCI
8.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Highly penetrative, drug-loaded nanocarriers improve treatment of glioblastoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1304504110
The paper
Zhou, J., Patel, T. R., Sirianni, R. W., Strohbehn, G., Zheng, M.-Q., Duong, N., Schafbauer, T., Huttner, A. J., Huang, Y., Carson, R. E., Zhang, Y., Sullivan, D. J., Piepmeier, J. M., & Saltzman, W. M. (2013). Highly penetrative, drug-loaded nanocarriers improve treatment of glioblastoma. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1304504110

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.