The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Present and future global distributions of the marine Cyanobacteria Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus
Open accessAbstract
The Cyanobacteria Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus account for a substantial fraction of marine primary production. Here, we present quantitative niche models for these lineages that assess present and future global abundances and distributions. These niche models are the result of neural network, nonparametric, and parametric analyses, and they rely on >35,000 discrete observations from all major ocean regions. The models assess cell abundance based on temperature and photosynthetically active radiation, but the individual responses to these environmental variables differ for each lineage. The models estimate global biogeographic patterns and seasonal variability of cell abundance, with maxima in the warm oligotrophic gyres of the Indian and the western Pacific Oceans and minima at higher latitudes. The annual mean global abundances of Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus are 2.9 ± 0.1 × 10 27 and 7.0 ± 0.3 × 10 26 cells, respectively. Using projections of sea surface temperature as a result of increased concentration of greenhouse gases at the end of the 21st century, our niche models projected increases in cell numbers of 29% and 14% for Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus, respectively. The changes are geographically uneven but include an increase in area. Thus, our global niche models suggest that oceanic microbial communities will experience complex changes as a result of projected future climate conditions. Because of the high abundances and contributions to primary production of Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus, these changes may have large impacts on ocean ecosystems and biogeochemical cycles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Overview of CMIP5 and the Experiment Design
Taylor, K. E., Stouffer, R. J., & Meehl, G. A. (2012) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/bams-d-11-00094.1 · Cited by 14,052
The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment
Moss, R. H., Edmonds, J. A., Hibbard, K. A., Manning, M. R., Rose, S. K., van Vuuren, D. P., Carter, T. R., Emori, S., Kainuma, M., Kram, T., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08823 · Cited by 6,467
Primary production of the biosphere: Integrating terrestrial and oceanic components
Field, C. B., Behrenfeld, M. J., Randerson, J. T., & Falkowski, P. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.281.5374.237 · Cited by 6,371
Prokaryotes: The unseen majority
Whitman, W. B., Coleman, D. C., & Wiebe, W. J. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.12.6578 · Cited by 4,871 · cited 1×
“9 × 10(27) cells of total prokaryotic autotrophs (22).”
BackgroundA Global Pattern of Thermal Adaptation in Marine Phytoplankton
Thomas, M. K., Kremer, C. T., Klausmeier, C. A., & Litchman, E. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1224836 · Cited by 847
Cited by
The biomass distribution on Earth
Bar-On, Y. M., Phillips, R., & Milo, R. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1711842115 · Cited by 3,723
“For cyanobacteria, a study based on independent data of cell concentrations (265) estimated the total number of cells of prochlorococcus and synechococcus, which are estimated at ≈3×10(27) and ≈7×10(26) cells, respectively.”
BackgroundBacteria and archaea on Earth and their abundance in biofilms
Flemming, H.-C., & Wuertz, S. (2019) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-019-0158-9 · Cited by 1,729
Scaling laws predict global microbial diversity
Locey, K. J., & Lennon, J. T. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1521291113 · Cited by 1,184
Microorganisms and ocean global change
Hutchins, D. A., & Fu, F. (2017) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nmicrobiol.2017.58 · Cited by 499
Cyanobacteria and biogeochemical cycles through Earth history
Sánchez-Baracaldo, P., Bianchini, G., Wilson, J. D., & Knoll, A. H. (2022) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2021.05.008 · Cited by 279
Metadata
- Authors
- Flombaum, P., Gallegos, J. L., Gordillo, R. A., Rincón, J., Zabala, L. L., Jiao, N., Karl, D. M., Li, W. K. W., Lomas, M. W., Veneziano, D., Vera, C. S., Vrugt, J. A., & Martiny, A. C.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2013-05-23
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 9824-9829
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2000946245
- Cited by
- 1,416
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 39.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Present and future global distributions of the marine Cyanobacteria Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1307701110
- The paper
- Flombaum, P., Gallegos, J. L., Gordillo, R. A., Rincón, J., Zabala, L. L., Jiao, N., Karl, D. M., Li, W. K. W., Lomas, M. W., Veneziano, D., Vera, C. S., Vrugt, J. A., & Martiny, A. C. (2013). Present and future global distributions of the marine Cyanobacteria Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1307701110
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.