Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 345

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Blockade of A 2A receptors potently suppresses the metastasis of CD73 + tumors

Open access
Beavis, Paul A., Divisekera, Upulie, Paget, Christophe, Chow, Melvyn T., John, Liza B., Devaud, Christel, Dwyer, Karen, Stagg, John, Smyth, Mark J., Darcy, Phillip K.·2013·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

CD73 inhibits antitumor immunity through the activation of adenosine receptors expressed on multiple immune subsets. CD73 also enhances tumor metastasis, although the nature of the immune subsets and adenosine receptor subtypes involved in this process are largely unknown. In this study, we revealed that A 2A /A 2B receptor antagonists were effective in reducing the metastasis of tumors expressing CD73 endogenously (4T1.2 breast tumors) and when CD73 was ectopically expressed (B16F10 melanoma). A 2A −/− mice were strongly protected against tumor metastasis, indicating that host A 2A receptors enhanced tumor metastasis. A 2A blockade enhanced natural killer (NK) cell maturation and cytotoxic function in vitro, reduced metastasis in a perforin-dependent manner, and enhanced NK cell expression of granzyme B in vivo, strongly suggesting that the antimetastatic effect of A 2A blockade was due to enhanced NK cell function. Interestingly, A 2B blockade had no effect on NK cell cytotoxicity, indicating that an NK cell-independent mechanism also contributed to the increased metastasis of CD73 + tumors. Our results thus revealed that CD73 promotes tumor metastasis through multiple mechanisms, including suppression of NK cell function. Furthermore, our data strongly suggest that A 2A or A 2B antagonists may be useful for the treatment of metastatic disease. Overall, our study has potential therapeutic implications given that A 2A /A 2B receptor antagonists have already entered clinical trials in other therapeutic settings.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1308209110

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 345

Metadata

Authors
Beavis, P. A., Divisekera, U., Paget, C., Chow, M. T., John, L. B., Devaud, C., Dwyer, K., Stagg, J., Smyth, M. J., & Darcy, P. K.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2013-08-20
Volume
110
Issue
36
Pages
14711-14716
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2030272844
Cited by
345
References
1
FWCI
17.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Blockade of A 2A receptors potently suppresses the metastasis of CD73 + tumors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1308209110
The paper
Beavis, P. A., Divisekera, U., Paget, C., Chow, M. T., John, L. B., Devaud, C., Dwyer, K., Stagg, J., Smyth, M. J., & Darcy, P. K. (2013). Blockade of A 2A receptors potently suppresses the metastasis of CD73 + tumors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1308209110

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.