The DOI matches its Crossref record; 86 of the 86 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Spatial interactions among ecosystem services in an urbanizing agricultural watershed
Open accessAbstract
Understanding spatial distributions, synergies, and tradeoffs of multiple ecosystem services (benefits people derive from ecosystems) remains challenging. We analyzed the supply of 10 ecosystem services for 2006 across a large urbanizing agricultural watershed in the Upper Midwest of the United States, and asked the following: ( i ) Where are areas of high and low supply of individual ecosystem services, and are these areas spatially concordant across services? ( ii ) Where on the landscape are the strongest tradeoffs and synergies among ecosystem services located? ( iii ) For ecosystem service pairs that experience tradeoffs, what distinguishes locations that are “win–win” exceptions from other locations? Spatial patterns of high supply for multiple ecosystem services often were not coincident; locations where six or more services were produced at high levels (upper 20th percentile) occupied only 3.3% of the landscape. Most relationships among ecosystem services were synergies, but tradeoffs occurred between crop production and water quality. Ecosystem services related to water quality and quantity separated into three different groups, indicating that management to sustain freshwater services along with other ecosystem services will not be simple. Despite overall tradeoffs between crop production and water quality, some locations were positive for both, suggesting that tradeoffs are not inevitable everywhere and might be ameliorated in some locations. Overall, we found that different areas of the landscape supplied different suites of ecosystem services, and their lack of spatial concordance suggests the importance of managing over large areas to sustain multiple ecosystem services.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1983) · Cited by 79,866
The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital
Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., et al. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/387253a0 · Cited by 22,585
Hosmer, D. W., & Lemeshow, S. (2000) · doi:10.1002/0471722146 · Cited by 20,302
Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis
Assessment, M. E. (2005) · Island Press · doi:10.5281/zenodo.18167309 · Cited by 10,665
Cressie, N. (1992) · Terra Nova · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3121.1992.tb00605.x · Cited by 8,823
Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices
Tilman, D., Cassman, K. G., Matson, P. A., Naylor, R., & Polasky, S. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01014 · Cited by 7,957
Nonpoint Pollution of Surface Waters with Phosphorus and Nitrogen
Carpenter, S. R., Caraco, N. F., Correll, D. L., Howarth, R. W., Sharpley, A. N., & Smith, V. H. (1998) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/1051-0761(1998)008[0559:nposww]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 6,099
Rees, M., & Cressie, N. (1993) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society) · doi:10.2307/2982871 · Cited by 5,101
Agricultural Intensification and Ecosystem Properties
Matson, P. A., Parton, W. J., Power, A. G., & Swift, M. J. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.277.5325.504 · Cited by 3,160
Daly, C., Halbleib, M., Smith, J. I., Gibson, W. P., Doggett, M. K., Taylor, G. H., Curtis, J., & Pasteris, P. P. (2008) · International Journal of Climatology · doi:10.1002/joc.1688 · Cited by 3,100
Cited by
Xia, H., Yuan, S., & Prishchepov, A. V. (2023) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106767 · Cited by 523
Macrosystems ecology: understanding ecological patterns and processes at continental scales
Heffernan, J. B., Soranno, P. A., Angilletta, M. J., Buckley, L. B., Gruner, D. S., Keitt, T. H., Kellner, J. R., Kominoski, J. S., Rocha, A. V., Xiao, J., et al. (2014) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1890/130017 · Cited by 358
Shen, J., Li, S., Liu, L., Liang, Z., Wang, Y., Wang, H., & Wu, S. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125193 · Cited by 268
Zhang, Z., Liu, Y., Wang, Y., Liu, Y., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120454 · Cited by 267
Coleman, S., Hurley, S., Rizzo, D., Koliba, C., & Zia, A. (2018) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.09.005 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Qiu, J., & Turner, M. G.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2013-07
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 29
- Pages
- 12149-12154
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2097913848
- Cited by
- 454
- References
- 86
- FWCI
- 17.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spatial interactions among ecosystem services in an urbanizing agricultural watershed. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1310539110
- The paper
- Qiu, J., & Turner, M. G. (2013). Spatial interactions among ecosystem services in an urbanizing agricultural watershed. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1310539110
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
