Cited by 162Cognitive Abilities and TestingSex and Gender in HealthcareDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

The changing face of cognitive gender differences in Europe

Open access
Weber, Daniela, Skirbekk, Vegard, Freund, Inga, Herlitz, Agneta·2014·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: Results showing that gender differences in mathematics and science are smaller in countries with higher gender equality have led researchers to conclude that cognitive gender differences are decreasing as a function of increased gender equality. Instead, we find that improved living conditions and less gender-restricted educational opportunities are associated with increased gender differences favoring women in some cognitive functions and decreases or elimination of gender differences in other cognitive abilities. Our results suggest that these changes take place as a result of women gaining more than men from societal improvements over time, thereby increasing their general cognitive ability more than men.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1319538111

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Higher living conditions are associated with smaller sex differences in cognitive tasks in which there is an overall male advantage (e.g., numeracy).

    “For example, we have reported that for cognitive performance, higher living conditions are associated with larger sex differences in cognitive tasks in which there is an overall female advantage (e.g., episodic memory) and smaller in those in which there is an overall male advantage (e.g., numeracy; Asperholm, Nagar, et al., 2019; Weber et al., 2014).”

    From A Systematic Review and New Analyses of the Gender-Equality Paradox (2025) · cites this paper as Weber et al., 2014

  • Higher living conditions are associated with larger sex differences in cognitive tasks in which there is an overall female advantage (e.g., episodic memory).

    “For example, we have reported that for cognitive performance, higher living conditions are associated with larger sex differences in cognitive tasks in which there is an overall female advantage (e.g., episodic memory) and smaller in those in which there is an overall male advantage (e.g., numeracy; Asperholm, Nagar, et al., 2019; Weber et al., 2014).”

    From A Systematic Review and New Analyses of the Gender-Equality Paradox (2025) · cites this paper as Weber et al., 2014

  • Two studies that investigated Semantic memory (category fluency) indicated that there is a male advantage.

    “By contrast, two studies that investigated Semantic memory (category fluency) indicated that there is a male advantage (Bonsang et al., 2017; Weber et al., 2014).”

    From A Systematic Review and New Analyses of the Gender-Equality Paradox (2025) · cites this paper as Weber et al., 2014

  • For Semantic memory (category fluency), analyzed in the old analyses, both studies indicated that the male advantage is smaller in countries with higher living conditions (Bonsang et al., 2017; Weber et al., 2014).

    “For Semantic memory (category fluency), analyzed in the old analyses, both studies indicated that the male advantage is smaller in countries with higher living conditions (Bonsang et al., 2017; Weber et al., 2014).”

    From A Systematic Review and New Analyses of the Gender-Equality Paradox (2025) · cites this paper as Weber et al., 2014

  • Studies that used data on older adults (55+) found a rather coherent pattern of sex differences being smaller in countries with higher living conditions.

    “Note that studies that used data on older adults (55+; Dickerson et al., 2015; Voyer & Voyer, 2014; Weber et al., 2014) found a rather coherent pattern of sex differences being smaller in countries with higher living conditions.”

    From A Systematic Review and New Analyses of the Gender-Equality Paradox (2025) · cites this paper as Weber et al., 2014

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weber, D., Skirbekk, V., Freund, I., & Herlitz, A.
Affiliations
  • International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (AT)
  • TU Wien (AT)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2014-07-28
Volume
111
Issue
32
Pages
11673-11678
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1981668942
Cited by
162
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 3
FWCI
20.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IIASA PURE (International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis) (acceptedVersion)
  • WU Research (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission (261982, IAG BSR06-11, QLK6‐CT‐2001‐ 00360, RII-CT- 2006-062193, P01_AG08291, SHARE-I3: RII-CT-2006-062193, SHARE M4, SHARE-I3, U01 AG09740-13S2, P30 AG12815, CIT5-CT-2005- 028857, R21_AG025169, P01 AG005842, 211909, OGHA 04-064, CIT4-CT-2006-028812, Y1-AG-4553-01, 227822, COMPARE: CIT5‐CT‐2005‐028857, SHARELIFE: CIT4-CT-2006–028812)
  • Forskningsrådet för Arbetsliv och Socialvetenskap (QLK6-CT-2001-00360)
  • Vetenskapsrådet
  • National Institutes of Health (2p30ag012815-16)
  • National Institute on Aging (U01 AG09740‐13S2, P30AG12815, P01AG08291, P01AG008291, P30AG012815, R21AG025169, P01AG005842, U01AG009740, Y1-AG-4553–01)
  • FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (241003, 323947)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Sex and Gender in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
episodic memory, numeracy, semantic fluency, birth cohort, living conditions, educational opportunities, middle-aged and older adults, women's cognitive performance, regional variation
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cognition, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Educational Status, Europe, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychometrics, Sex Characteristics, Social Conditions, Cohort Studies, Memory, Episodic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review