Cited by 55Memory Processes and InfluencesCognitive Abilities and TestingSex and Gender in Healthcare

The magnitude of sex differences in verbal episodic memory increases with social progress: Data from 54 countries across 40 years

Open access
Asperholm, Martin, Nagar, Sanket, Dekhtyar, Serhiy, Herlitz, Agneta·2019·PLOS ONE

Abstract

Sex differences in episodic memory have been reported. We investigate (1) the existence of sex differences in verbal and other episodic memory tasks in 54 countries, and (2) the association between the time- and country-specific social progress indicators (a) female to male ratio in education and labor force participation, (b) population education and employment, and (c) GDP per capita, and magnitude of sex differences in verbal episodic memory tasks. Data were retrieved from 612 studies, published 1973-2013. Results showed that females outperformed (Cohen's d > 0) males in verbal (42 out of 45 countries) and other (28 out of 45 countries) episodic memory tasks. Although all three social progress indicators were, separately, positively associated with the female advantage in verbal episodic memory performance, only population education and employment remained significant when considering the social indicators together. Results suggest that women's verbal episodic memory performance benefits more than men's from education and employment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0214945

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Higher living conditions are associated with smaller sex differences in cognitive tasks in which there is an overall male advantage (e.g., numeracy).

    “For example, we have reported that for cognitive performance, higher living conditions are associated with larger sex differences in cognitive tasks in which there is an overall female advantage (e.g., episodic memory) and smaller in those in which there is an overall male advantage (e.g., numeracy; Asperholm, Nagar, et al., 2019; Weber et al., 2014).”

    From A Systematic Review and New Analyses of the Gender-Equality Paradox (2025) · cites this paper as Asperholm, Nagar, et al., 2019

    The Introduction (page not provided) reports a study in which boys’ mathematics advantage disappeared in the most gender-equal countries, supporting the numeracy example. But it also describes mixed findings, including larger male advantages in some spatial tasks in more gender-equal societies. The paper therefore does not support the broader pattern asserted for male-advantaged cognitive tasks. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • For Episodic memory, sex differences favoring women appear to be larger in countries with higher living conditions (Asperholm, Nagar, et al., 2019; Bonsang et al., 2017; Weber et al., 2017), although one study that examined object-location memory did not find such an association (Silverman et al., 2007).

    “For Episodic memory, sex differences favoring women appear to be larger in countries with higher living conditions (Asperholm, Nagar, et al., 2019; Bonsang et al., 2017; Weber et al., 2017), although one study that examined object-location memory did not find such an association (Silverman et al., 2007).”

    From A Systematic Review and New Analyses of the Gender-Equality Paradox (2025) · cites this paper as Asperholm, Nagar, et al., 2019

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Higher living conditions are associated with larger sex differences in cognitive tasks in which there is an overall female advantage (e.g., episodic memory).

    “For example, we have reported that for cognitive performance, higher living conditions are associated with larger sex differences in cognitive tasks in which there is an overall female advantage (e.g., episodic memory) and smaller in those in which there is an overall male advantage (e.g., numeracy; Asperholm, Nagar, et al., 2019; Weber et al., 2014).”

    From A Systematic Review and New Analyses of the Gender-Equality Paradox (2025) · cites this paper as Asperholm, Nagar, et al., 2019

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [2]Hyde JS, Linn MC. Gender differences in verbal ability. Psychological Bulletin. 1988; 104(1): 53– 69.
  2. [9]Guiso L, Monte F, Sapienza P, Zingales L. Diversity. Culture, gender, and math. Science. 2008; 320(5880): 1163– 5. 18511674
  3. [13]Herlitz A, Z K. Gender differences and similarities in cognitive functions in Bangladesh and Sweden. International Psychogeriatrics. 2005; 17: 107–.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Asperholm, M., Nagar, S., Dekhtyar, S., & Herlitz, A.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Monash University (AU)
Corresponding author
Asperholm, Martin
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2019-04-22
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
e0214945
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2941746392
Cited by
54
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4
FWCI
4.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Swedish Research Council (721-2014-2241)
  • Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research (2010-0705)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Sex and Gender in Healthcare
Keywords
sex differences, verbal episodic memory, social progress, female advantage, labor force participation, GDP per capita, cross-national comparison, cognitive performance
MeSH terms
Cognition, Female, Humans, Male, Retrospective Studies, Sex Characteristics, Socioeconomic Factors, Memory, Episodic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review