Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 282

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Complementary symbiont contributions to plant decomposition in a fungus-farming termite

Open access
Poulsen, Michael, Hu, Haofu, Li, Cai, Chen, Zhensheng, Xu, Luohao, Otani, Saria, Nygaard, Sanne, Nobre, Tania, Klaubauf, Sylvia, Schindler, Philipp M., Hauser, Frank, Pan, Hailin, Yang, Zhikai, Sonnenberg, Anton S. M., de Beer, Z. Wilhelm, Zhang, Yong, Wingfield, Michael J., Grimmelikhuijzen, Cornelis J. P., de Vries, Ronald P., Korb, Judith, Aanen, Duur K., Wang, Jun, Boomsma, Jacobus J., Zhang, Guojie·2014·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: Old World (sub)tropical fungus-growing termites owe their massive ecological footprints to an advanced symbiosis with Termitomyces fungi. They also have abundant gut bacteria, but the complementarity roles of these symbionts have remained unclear. We analyzed the genomic potential for biomass decomposition in a farming termite, its fungal symbiont, and its bacterial gut communities. We found that plant biomass conversion is mostly a multistage complementary cooperation between Termitomyces and gut bacteria, with termite farmers primarily providing the gut compartments, foraging, and nest building. A mature queen had highly reduced gut microbial diversity for decomposition enzymes, suggesting she had an exclusively fungal diet even though she may have been the source of the gut microbes of the colony’s first workers and soldiers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1319718111

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 282

Metadata

Authors
Poulsen, M., Hu, H., Li, C., Chen, Z., Xu, L., Otani, S., Nygaard, S., Nobre, T., Klaubauf, S., Schindler, P. M., Hauser, F., Pan, H., Yang, Z., Sonnenberg, A. S. M., de Beer, Z. W., Zhang, Y., Wingfield, M. J., Grimmelikhuijzen, C. J. P., de Vries, R. P., Korb, J., Aanen, D. K., Wang, J., Boomsma, J. J., & Zhang, G.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2014-09-22
Volume
111
Issue
40
Pages
14500-14505
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2060197260
Cited by
282
References
6
FWCI
10.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Complementary symbiont contributions to plant decomposition in a fungus-farming termite. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1319718111
The paper
Poulsen, M., Hu, H., Li, C., Chen, Z., Xu, L., Otani, S., Nygaard, S., Nobre, T., Klaubauf, S., Schindler, P. M., Hauser, F., Pan, H., Yang, Z., Sonnenberg, A. S. M., de Beer, Z. W., Zhang, Y., Wingfield, M. J., Grimmelikhuijzen, C. J. P., de Vries, R. P., . . . Zhang, G. (2014). Complementary symbiont contributions to plant decomposition in a fungus-farming termite. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319718111

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.