The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Rapid and general profiling of protease specificity by using combinatorial fluorogenic substrate libraries
Open accessAbstract
A method is presented for the preparation and use of fluorogenic peptide substrates that allows for the configuration of general substrate libraries to rapidly identify the primary and extended specificity of proteases. The substrates contain the fluorogenic leaving group 7-amino-4-carbamoylmethylcoumarin (ACC). Substrates incorporating the ACC leaving group show kinetic profiles comparable to those with the traditionally used 7-amino-4-methylcoumarin (AMC) leaving group. The bifunctional nature of ACC allows for the efficient production of single substrates and substrate libraries by using 9-fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl (Fmoc)-based solid-phase synthesis techniques. The approximately 3-fold-increased quantum yield of ACC over AMC permits reduction in enzyme and substrate concentrations. As a consequence, a greater number of substrates can be tolerated in a single assay, thus enabling an increase in the diversity space of the library. Soluble positional protease substrate libraries of 137,180 and 6,859 members, possessing amino acid diversity at the P4-P3-P2-P1 and P4-P3-P2 positions, respectively, were constructed. Employing this screening method, we profiled the substrate specificities of a diverse array of proteases, including the serine proteases thrombin, plasmin, factor Xa, urokinase-type plasminogen activator, tissue plasminogen activator, granzyme B, trypsin, chymotrypsin, human neutrophil elastase, and the cysteine proteases papain and cruzain. The resulting profiles create a pharmacophoric portrayal of the proteases to aid in the design of selective substrates and potent inhibitors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Protease degradomics: A new challenge for proteomics
López-Otín, C., & Overall, C. M. (2002) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm858 · Cited by 664
Determination of protease cleavage site motifs using mixture-based oriented peptide libraries
Turk, B. E., Huang, L. L., Piro, E. T., & Cantley, L. C. (2001) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/90273 · Cited by 560
Proteome-derived, database-searchable peptide libraries for identifying protease cleavage sites
Schilling, O., & Overall, C. M. (2008) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1408 · Cited by 401
Activity-Based Profiling of Proteases
Sanman, L. E., & Bogyo, M. (2014) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-060713-035352 · Cited by 330
Tam, E. M., Morrison, C. J., Wu, Y. I., Stack, M. S., & Overall, C. M. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0305862101 · Cited by 244
Metadata
- Authors
- Harris, J. L., Backes, B. J., Leonetti, F., Mahrus, S., Ellman, J. A., & Craik, C. S.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2000-06-27
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 7754-7759
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2103700658
- Cited by
- 541
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rapid and general profiling of protease specificity by using combinatorial fluorogenic substrate libraries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.140132697
- The paper
- Harris, J. L., Backes, B. J., Leonetti, F., Mahrus, S., Ellman, J. A., & Craik, C. S. (2000). Rapid and general profiling of protease specificity by using combinatorial fluorogenic substrate libraries. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.140132697
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.