Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 573

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Patterned progression of bacterial populations in the premature infant gut

Open access
La Rosa, Patricio S., Warner, Barbara B., Zhou, Yanjiao, Weinstock, George M., Sodergren, Erica, Hall-Moore, Carla M., Stevens, Harold J., Bennett, William E., Shaikh, Nurmohammad, Linneman, Laura A., Hoffmann, Julie A., Hamvas, Aaron, Deych, Elena, Shands, Berkley A., Shannon, William D., Tarr, Phillip I.·2014·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: It is increasingly apparent that bacteria in the gut are important determinants of health and disease in humans. However, we know remarkably little about how this organ transitions from a sterile/near-sterile state at birth to one that soon harbors a highly diverse biomass. We show in premature infants a patterned progression of the gut bacterial community that is only minimally influenced by mode of delivery, antibiotics, or feeds. The pace of this progression is most strongly influenced by gestational age, with the microbial population assembling slowest for infants born most prematurely. These data raise the possibility that host biology, more than exogenous factors such as antibiotics, feeds, and route of delivery, drives bacterial populations in the premature newborn infant gut.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1409497111

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 573

Metadata

Authors
La Rosa, P. S., Warner, B. B., Zhou, Y., Weinstock, G. M., Sodergren, E., Hall-Moore, C. M., Stevens, H. J., Bennett, W. E., Shaikh, N., Linneman, L. A., Hoffmann, J. A., Hamvas, A., Deych, E., Shands, B. A., Shannon, W. D., & Tarr, P. I.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2014-08-11
Volume
111
Issue
34
Pages
12522-12527
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2010916289
Cited by
573
References
10
FWCI
15.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.