The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mechanical behavior in living cells consistent with the tensegrity model
Open accessAbstract
Alternative models of cell mechanics depict the living cell as a simple mechanical continuum, porous filament gel, tensed cortical membrane, or tensegrity network that maintains a stabilizing prestress through incorporation of discrete structural elements that bear compression. Real-time microscopic analysis of cells containing GFP-labeled microtubules and associated mitochondria revealed that living cells behave like discrete structures composed of an interconnected network of actin microfilaments and microtubules when mechanical stresses are applied to cell surface integrin receptors. Quantitation of cell tractional forces and cellular prestress by using traction force microscopy confirmed that microtubules bear compression and are responsible for a significant portion of the cytoskeletal prestress that determines cell shape stability under conditions in which myosin light chain phosphorylation and intracellular calcium remained unchanged. Quantitative measurements of both static and dynamic mechanical behaviors in cells also were consistent with specific a priori predictions of the tensegrity model. These findings suggest that tensegrity represents a unified model of cell mechanics that may help to explain how mechanical behaviors emerge through collective interactions among different cytoskeletal filaments and extracellular adhesions in living cells.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their Substrate
Discher, D. E., Janmey, P., & Wang, Y.-L. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1116995 · Cited by 6,382
Myotubes differentiate optimally on substrates with tissue-like stiffness
Engler, A. J., Griffin, M. A., Sen, S., Bönnemann, C. G., Sweeney, H. L., & Discher, D. E. (2004) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.200405004 · Cited by 1,743
Cellular mechanotransduction: putting all the pieces together again
Ingber, D. E. (2006) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fj.05-5424rev · Cited by 1,627
Self-citationHarnessing nanotopography and integrin–matrix interactions to influence stem cell fate
Dalby, M. J., Gadegaard, N., & Oreffo, R. O. C. (2014) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3980 · Cited by 1,082
Bacakova, L., Filova, E., Parizek, M., Ruml, T., & Svorcik, V. (2011) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.06.004 · Cited by 1,000
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, N., Naruse, K., Stamenović, D., Fredberg, J. J., Mijailovich, S. M., Tolić-Nørrelykke, I. M., Polte, T., Mannix, R., & Ingber, D. E.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2001-07-03
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 7765-7770
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2158200659
- Cited by
- 741
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanical behavior in living cells consistent with the tensegrity model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.141199598
- The paper
- Wang, N., Naruse, K., Stamenović, D., Fredberg, J. J., Mijailovich, S. M., Tolić-Nørrelykke, I. M., Polte, T., Mannix, R., & Ingber, D. E. (2001). Mechanical behavior in living cells consistent with the tensegrity model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.141199598
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.