Cited by 375Coastal and Marine ManagementSustainability and Climate Change GovernanceMarine and fisheries research

Operationalizing the social-ecological systems framework to assess sustainability

Open access
Leslie, Heather M., Basurto, Xavier, Nenadovic, Mateja, Sievanen, Leila, Cavanaugh, Kyle C., Cota-Nieto, Juan José, Erisman, Brad E., Finkbeiner, Elena +9 more·2015·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: Meeting human needs while sustaining ecosystems and the benefits they provide is a global challenge. Coastal marine systems present a particularly important case, given that >50% of the world’s population lives within 100 km of the coast and fisheries are the primary source of protein for >1 billion people worldwide. Our integrative analysis here yields an understanding of the sustainability of coupled social-ecological systems that is quite distinct from that provided by either the biophysical or the social sciences alone and that illustrates the feasibility and value of operationalizing the social-ecological systems framework for comparative analyses of coupled systems, particularly in data-poor and developing nation settings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1414640112

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The literature on SETs framing for climate action is growing rapidly, arguing sustainable solutions that benefit both people and nature.

    “The literature on SETs framing for climate action is growing rapidly, arguing sustainable solutions that benefit both people and nature (28, 29).”
  • Almost 60% of land in Georgia is composed of naturally recruited and planted temperate forests, and Georgia is the number one forestry state in the nation.

    “Almost 60% of land in Georgia is composed of naturally recruited and planted temperate forests, and Georgia is the number one forestry state in the nation (29).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leslie, H. M., Basurto, X., Nenadovic, M., Sievanen, L., Cavanaugh, K. C., Cota-Nieto, J. J., Erisman, B. E., Finkbeiner, E., Hinojosa-Arango, G., Moreno-Báez, M., Nagavarapu, S., Reddy, S. M. W., Sánchez-Rodríguez, A., Siegel, K., Ulibarria-Valenzuela, J. J., Weaver, A. H., & Aburto-Oropeza, O.
Affiliations
  • Brown University (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • Duke University Marine Laboratory, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Beaufort, NC 28516;
  • Smithsonian Institution (US)
  • Centro para la Biodiversidad Marina y la Conservación A.C., La Paz, BCS, 23090 Mexico;
  • Scripps Institution of Oceanography (US)
  • Hopkins Marine Station (US)
  • The Nature Conservancy (US)
  • Fondo para la Protección de los Recursos Marinos, La Paz, BCS, 23090 Mexico; and
  • Sociedad de Historia Natural Niparaja A.C., La Paz, BCS, 23020 Mexico
  • Scripps Institution of Oceanography, Marine Biology Research Division, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0202;
Corresponding author
  • Leslie, Heather M.
  • Basurto, Xavier
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2015-04-27
Volume
112
Issue
19
Pages
5979-5984
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2037993219
Cited by
375
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 1
FWCI
96.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DukeSpace (Duke University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Smithsonian Digital Repository (Smithsonian Institution) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (GEO 1114964)
  • David and Lucile Packard Foundation (n/a)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Coastal and Marine Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
Keywords
social-ecological systems framework, sustainability assessment, small-scale fisheries, social-ecological systems, spatially explicit analysis, regional heterogeneity, sustainable resource use, Baja California Sur
MeSH terms
Animals, Conservation of Natural Resources, Developing Countries, Ecology, Fisheries, Fishes, Food Supply, Geography, Humans, Mexico, Social Environment, Systems Analysis, Ecosystem

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review