Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 328

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Methane emissions from natural gas infrastructure and use in the urban region of Boston, Massachusetts

Open access
McKain, Kathryn, Down, Adrian, Raciti, Steve M., Budney, John, Hutyra, Lucy R., Floerchinger, Cody, Herndon, Scott C., Nehrkorn, Thomas, Zahniser, Mark S., Jackson, Robert B., Phillips, Nathan, Wofsy, Steven C.·2015·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: Most recent analyses of the environmental impact of natural gas have focused on production, with very sparse information on emissions from distribution and end use. This study quantifies the full seasonal cycle of methane emissions and the fractional contribution of natural gas for the urbanized region centered on Boston. Emissions from natural gas are found to be two to three times larger than predicted by existing inventory methodologies and industry reports. Our findings suggest that natural-gas–consuming regions may be larger sources of methane to the atmosphere than is currently estimated and represent areas of significant resource loss.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1416261112

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. G Myhre, , Anthropogenic and natural radiative forcing. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, eds TF Stocker, (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK), pp. 659–740 (2013).
  2. AM Fiore, DJ Jacob, BD Field, DG Streets, SD Fernandes, Linking ozone pollution and climate change: The case for controlling methane. Geophys Res Lett 29, 25-1–25-4 (2002). · DOI · Paper page
  3. P Ciais, , Carbon and other biogeochemical cycles. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, eds TF Stocker, (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK), pp. 465–570 (2013).
  4. JJ West, AM Fiore, LW Horowitz, DL Mauzerall, Global health benefits of mitigating ozone pollution with methane emission controls. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103, 3988–3993 (2006). · DOI · Paper page
  5. AR Brandt, , Energy and environment. Methane leaks from North American natural gas systems. Science 343, 733–735 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  6. DR Blake, VH Woo, SC Tyler, FS Rowland, Methane concentrations and source strengths in urban locations. Geophys Res Lett 11, 1211–1214 (1984). · doi:10.1029/gl011i012p01211
  7. D Wunch, PO Wennberg, GC Toon, G Keppel-Aleks, YG Yavin, Emissions of greenhouse gases from a North American megacity. Geophys Res Lett 36, L15810 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  8. YK Hsu, , Methane emissions inventory verification in southern California. Atmos Environ 44, 1–7 (2010). · DOI
  9. PO Wennberg, , On the sources of methane to the Los Angeles atmosphere. Environ Sci Technol 46, 9282–9289 (2012). · DOI
  10. J Peischl, , Quantifying sources of methane using light alkanes in the Los Angeles basin, California. J Geophys Res Atmos 118, 1–17 (2013). · DOI
  11. GW Santoni Fluxes of atmospheric methane using novel instruments field measurements and inverse modeling. PhD thesis (Harvard University Cambridge MA). (2013).
  12. NG Phillips, , Mapping urban pipeline leaks: Methane leaks across Boston. Environ Pollut 173, 1–4 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  13. TI Yacovitch, , Demonstration of an ethane spectrometer for methane source identification. Environ Sci Technol 48, 8028–8034 (2014). · DOI
  14. WH Press, SA Teukolsky, WT Vetterling, BP Flannery, Modeling of data. Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN: The Art of Scientific Computing (Cambridge Univ Press, 2nd Ed, New York, Chap 15. (2002).
  15. JC Lin, , A near-field tool or simulating the upstream influence of atmospheric observations: The Stochastic Time-Inverted Lagrangian Transport (STILT) model. J Geophys Res 108, 4493–4510 (2003).
  16. T Nehrkorn, , Coupled weather research and forecasting-stochastic time-inverted Lagrangian transport (WRF-STILT) model. Meteorol Atmos Phys 107, 51–64 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  17. JB Van Hulzen, R Segers, PM van Bodegom, PA Leffelaar, Temperature effects on soil methane production: An explanation for observed variability. Soil Biol Biochem 31, 1919–1926 (1999). · DOI · Paper page
  18. K Spokas J Bogner J Chanton A process-based inventory model for landfill CH 4 emissions inclusive of seasonal soil microclimate and CH 4 oxidation. J Geophys Res Biogeosci 116:G04017. (2011). · doi:10.1029/2011jg001741

Cited by

See all 328

Metadata

Authors
McKain, K., Down, A., Raciti, S. M., Budney, J., Hutyra, L. R., Floerchinger, C., Herndon, S. C., Nehrkorn, T., Zahniser, M. S., Jackson, R. B., Phillips, N., & Wofsy, S. C.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2015-01-23
Volume
112
Issue
7
Pages
1941-1946
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2055235188
Cited by
328
References
1
FWCI
26.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1337512, 1265614, 1302902, 0948819)
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NNX12AM82G, NNH13CK02C, NNX11AG47G)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Methane emissions from natural gas infrastructure and use in the urban region of Boston, Massachusetts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1416261112
The paper
McKain, K., Down, A., Raciti, S. M., Budney, J., Hutyra, L. R., Floerchinger, C., Herndon, S. C., Nehrkorn, T., Zahniser, M. S., Jackson, R. B., Phillips, N., & Wofsy, S. C. (2015). Methane emissions from natural gas infrastructure and use in the urban region of Boston, Massachusetts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1416261112

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.