The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Characterization of the expression of MHC proteins in human embryonic stem cells
Open accessAbstract
Human embryonic stem (ES) cells are pluripotent cells that may be used in transplantation medicine. These cells can be induced to differentiate into cells from the three embryonic germ layers both in vivo and in vitro. To determine whether human ES cells might be rejected after transplantation, we examined cell surface expression of the MHC proteins in these cells. Our results show very low expression levels of MHC class I (MHC-I) proteins on the surface of human ES cells that moderately increase on in vitro or in vivo differentiation. A dramatic induction of MHC-I proteins was observed when the cells were treated with IFN-γ but not with IFN-α or -β. However, all three IFNs induced expression of MHC-I proteins in differentiated human ES cells. MHC-II proteins and HLA-G were not expressed on the surface of undifferentiated or differentiated cells. Ligands for natural killer cell receptors were either absent or expressed in very low levels in human ES cells and in their differentiated derivatives. In accordance, natural killer cytotoxic assays demonstrated only limited lysis of both undifferentiated and differentiated cells. To initiate a histocompatibility databank of human ES cells, we have isotyped several of the published ES cell lines for their human leukocyte antigens. In conclusion, our results demonstrate that human ES cells can express high levels of MHC-I proteins and thus may be rejected on transplantation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Induced pluripotent stem cell technology: a decade of progress.
Shi, Y., Inoue, H., Wu, J. C., & Yamanaka, S. (2017) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd.2016.245 · Cited by 1,525
Characterization of human embryonic stem cell lines by the International Stem Cell Initiative
Initiative, T. I. S. C. (2007) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1318 · Cited by 1,073
Hanna, J., Cheng, A. W., Saha, K., Kim, J., Lengner, C. J., Soldner, F., Cassady, J. P., Muffat, J., Carey, B. W., & Jaenisch, R. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1004584107 · Cited by 847
Embryonic Stem Cells: Prospects for Developmental Biology and Cell Therapy
Wobus, A. M., & Boheler, K. R. (2005) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00054.2003 · Cited by 782
Cell encapsulation: Promise and progress
Orive, G., Hernández, R. M., Gascón, A. R., Calafiore, R., Chang, T. M. S., Vos, P. D., Hortelano, G., Hunkeler, D., Lacík, I., Shapiro, A. M. J., et al. (2003) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm0103-104 · Cited by 592
Metadata
- Authors
- Drukker, M., Katz, G., Urbach, A., Schuldiner, M., Markel, G., Itskovitz-Eldor, J., Reubinoff, B., Mandelboim, O., & Benvenisty, N.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2002-07-11
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 9864-9869
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2151517892
- Cited by
- 671
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characterization of the expression of MHC proteins in human embryonic stem cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.142298299
- The paper
- Drukker, M., Katz, G., Urbach, A., Schuldiner, M., Markel, G., Itskovitz-Eldor, J., Reubinoff, B., Mandelboim, O., & Benvenisty, N. (2002). Characterization of the expression of MHC proteins in human embryonic stem cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.142298299
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.