Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 177

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Vaccine composition formulated with a novel TLR7-dependent adjuvant induces high and broad protection against Staphylococcus aureus

Open access
Bagnoli, Fabio, Fontana, Maria Rita, Soldaini, Elisabetta, Mishra, Ravi P. N., Fiaschi, Luigi, Cartocci, Elena, Nardi-Dei, Vincenzo, Ruggiero, Paolo, Nosari, Sarah, De Falco, Maria Grazia, Lofano, Giuseppe, Marchi, Sara, Galletti, Bruno, Mariotti, Paolo, Bacconi, Marta, Torre, Antonina, Maccari, Silvia, Scarselli, Maria, Rinaudo, C. Daniela, Inoshima, Naoko, Savino, Silvana, Mori, Elena, Rossi-Paccani, Silvia, Baudner, Barbara, Pallaoro, Michele, Swennen, Erwin, Petracca, Roberto, Brettoni, Cecilia, Liberatori, Sabrina, Norais, Nathalie, Monaci, Elisabetta, Bubeck Wardenburg, Juliane, Schneewind, Olaf, O’Hagan, Derek T., Valiante, Nicholas M., Bensi, Giuliano, Bertholet, Sylvie, De Gregorio, Ennio, Rappuoli, Rino, Grandi, Guido·2015·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: Staphylococcus aureus is a human pathogen causing life-threatening infections. The high incidence of methicillin-resistant S. aureus isolates resistant to all antibiotics makes the development of anti -S. aureus vaccines an urgent medical need. However, the unique ability of S. aureus to produce virulent factors, which counteract virtually all pathways of innate and adaptive immunity, has hampered all vaccine discovery efforts. Starting from the assumption that to be effective a vaccine should induce highly functional antibodies and potentiate the killing capacity of phagocytic cells, we selected a cocktail of five conserved antigens involved in different mechanisms of pathogenesis, and we formulated them with a potent adjuvant. This vaccine provides an unprecedented protective efficacy against S. aureus infection in animal models.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1424924112

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 177

Metadata

Authors
Bagnoli, F., Fontana, M. R., Soldaini, E., Mishra, R. P. N., Fiaschi, L., Cartocci, E., Nardi-Dei, V., Ruggiero, P., Nosari, S., De Falco, M. G., Lofano, G., Marchi, S., Galletti, B., Mariotti, P., Bacconi, M., Torre, A., Maccari, S., Scarselli, M., Rinaudo, C. D., Inoshima, N., Savino, S., Mori, E., Rossi-Paccani, S., Baudner, B., Pallaoro, M., Swennen, E., Petracca, R., Brettoni, C., Liberatori, S., Norais, N., Monaci, E., Bubeck Wardenburg, J., Schneewind, O., O’Hagan, D. T., Valiante, N. M., Bensi, G., Bertholet, S., De Gregorio, E., Rappuoli, R., & Grandi, G.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2015-03-09
Volume
112
Issue
12
Pages
3680-3685
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1965495205
Cited by
177
References
3
FWCI
21.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vaccine composition formulated with a novel TLR7-dependent adjuvant induces high and broad protection against Staphylococcus aureus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1424924112
The paper
Bagnoli, F., Fontana, M. R., Soldaini, E., Mishra, R. P. N., Fiaschi, L., Cartocci, E., Nardi-Dei, V., Ruggiero, P., Nosari, S., De Falco, M. G., Lofano, G., Marchi, S., Galletti, B., Mariotti, P., Bacconi, M., Torre, A., Maccari, S., Scarselli, M., Rinaudo, C. D., . . . Grandi, G. (2015). Vaccine composition formulated with a novel TLR7-dependent adjuvant induces high and broad protection against Staphylococcus aureus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1424924112

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.