The DOI matches its Crossref record.
High-resolution microPET imaging of carcinoembryonic antigen-positive xenografts by using a copper-64-labeled engineered antibody fragment
Open accessAbstract
Rapid imaging by antitumor antibodies has been limited by the prolonged targeting kinetics and clearance of labeled whole antibodies. Genetically engineered fragments with rapid access and high retention in tumor tissue combined with rapid blood clearance are suitable for labeling with short-lived radionuclides, including positron-emitting isotopes for positron-emission tomography (PET). An engineered fragment was developed from the high-affinity anticarcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) monoclonal antibody T84.66. This single-chain variable fragment (Fv)-C H 3, or minibody, was produced as a bivalent 80 kDa dimer. The macrocyclic chelating agent 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane- N,N′,N′′, N′′′ -tetraacetic acid (DOTA) was conjugated to the anti-CEA minibody for labeling with copper-64, a positron-emitting radionuclide ( t 1/2 = 12.7 h). In vivo distribution was evaluated in athymic mice bearing paired LS174T human colon carcinoma (CEA positive) and C6 rat glioma (CEA negative) xenografts. Five hours after injection with 64 Cu-DOTA-minibody, microPET imaging showed high uptake in CEA-positive tumor (17.9% injected dose per gram ± 3.79) compared with control tumor (6.0% injected dose per gram ± 1.0). In addition, significant uptake was seen in liver, with low uptake in other tissues. Average target/background ratios relative to neighboring tissue were 3–4:1. Engineered antibody fragments labeled with positron-emitting isotopes such as copper-64 provide a new class of agents for PET imaging of tumors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bartlett, D. W., Su, H., Hildebrandt, I. J., Weber, W. A., & Davis, M. E. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0707461104 · Cited by 803
Overcoming the Blood–Brain Barrier: The Role of Nanomaterials in Treating Neurological Diseases
Furtado, D., Björnmalm, M., Ayton, S., Bush, A. I., Kempe, K., & Caruso, F. (2018) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201801362 · Cited by 708
Radiometals for Combined Imaging and Therapy
Cutler, C. S., Hennkens, H. M., Sisay, N., Huclier-Markai, S., & Jurisson, S. S. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr3003104 · Cited by 395
Antibody-targeted radiation cancer therapy
Milenic, D. E., Brady, E. D., & Brechbiel, M. W. (2004) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd1413 · Cited by 380
Odyssey of a cancer nanoparticle: From injection site to site of action
Nichols, J. W., & Bae, Y. H. (2012) · Nano Today · doi:10.1016/j.nantod.2012.10.010 · Cited by 364
Metadata
- Authors
- Wu, A. M., Yazaki, P. J., Tsai, S.-W., Nguyen, K., Anderson, A.-L., McCarthy, D. W., Welch, M. J., Shively, J. E., Williams, L. E., Raubitschek, A. A., Wong, J. Y. C., Toyokuni, T., Phelps, M. E., & Gambhir, S. S.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2000-07-04
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 8495-8500
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2161362011
- Cited by
- 214
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High-resolution microPET imaging of carcinoembryonic antigen-positive xenografts by using a copper-64-labeled engineered antibody fragment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.150228297
- The paper
- Wu, A. M., Yazaki, P. J., Tsai, S.-W., Nguyen, K., Anderson, A.-L., McCarthy, D. W., Welch, M. J., Shively, J. E., Williams, L. E., Raubitschek, A. A., Wong, J. Y. C., Toyokuni, T., Phelps, M. E., & Gambhir, S. S. (2000). High-resolution microPET imaging of carcinoembryonic antigen-positive xenografts by using a copper-64-labeled engineered antibody fragment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.150228297
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.