CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,017Land Use and Ecosystem ServicesSustainable Development and Environmental PolicyConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 107 of the 108 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Natural capital and ecosystem services informing decisions: From promise to practice

Open access
Guerry, Anne D., Polasky, Stephen, Lubchenco, Jane, Chaplin-Kramer, Rebecca, Daily, Gretchen C., Griffin, Robert, Ruckelshaus, Mary, Bateman, Ian J., Duraiappah, Anantha, Elmqvist, Thomas, Feldman, Marcus W., Folke, Carl, Hoekstra, Jon, Kareiva, Peter M., Keeler, Bonnie L., Li, Shuzhuo, McKenzie, Emily, Ouyang, Zhiyun, Reyers, Belinda, Ricketts, Taylor H., Rockström, Johan, Tallis, Heather, Vira, Bhaskar·2015·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1503751112PMC PMC4475956
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The central challenge of the 21st century is to develop economic, social, and governance systems capable of ending poverty and achieving sustainable levels of population and consumption while securing the life-support systems underpinning current and future human well-being. Essential to meeting this challenge is the incorporation of natural capital and the ecosystem services it provides into decision-making. We explore progress and crucial gaps at this frontier, reflecting upon the 10 y since the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. We focus on three key dimensions of progress and ongoing challenges: raising awareness of the interdependence of ecosystems and human well-being, advancing the fundamental interdisciplinary science of ecosystem services, and implementing this science in decisions to restore natural capital and use it sustainably. Awareness of human dependence on nature is at an all-time high, the science of ecosystem services is rapidly advancing, and talk of natural capital is now common from governments to corporate boardrooms. However, successful implementation is still in early stages. We explore why ecosystem service information has yet to fundamentally change decision-making and suggest a path forward that emphasizes: ( i ) developing solid evidence linking decisions to impacts on natural capital and ecosystem services, and then to human well-being; ( ii ) working closely with leaders in government, business, and civil society to develop the knowledge, tools, and practices necessary to integrate natural capital and ecosystem services into everyday decision-making; and ( iii ) reforming institutions to change policy and practices to better align private short-term goals with societal long-term goals.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1503751112

Cites

107 of 107 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 108 references

1 of the 108 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. ; National Climate Assessment (NCA) 2014 National Climate Assessment (US Global Change Research Program, Washington, DC, 2014).
  2. ; United Nations Inclusive Wealth Report 2012: Measuring Progress Toward Sustainability | Natural Resource and Environmental Economics (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK, 2012).
  3. ; UK National Ecosystem Assessment The UK National Ecosystem Assessment: Synthesis of the Key Findings (UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK, 2011).
  4. ; Natural Capital Committee The State of Natural Capital: Protecting and Improving Natural Capital for Prosperity and Wellbeing (Natural Capital Committee, London, 2015).
  5. S Van der Ploeg, RS de Groot The TEEB Valuation Database—A Searchable Database of 1310 Estimates of Monetary Values of Ecosystem Services (Foundation for Sustainable Development, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2010).
  6. 10.1257/aer.98.2.1 · DOI
  7. 10.1257/aer.100.3.641 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.2307/2585925 · DOI
  9. ; National Development and Reform Commission Opinions on Accelerating the Construction of Ecological Civilization (National Development and Reform Commission of People's Republic of China, Beijing, 2013).
  10. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.033 · DOI
  11. ; Growth, Environment and Regional Planning Ecosystem Services in the Stockholm Region, Stockholm County, Sweden—Making the Value of Ecosystem Services Visible (Swedish Government Inquiries, Stockholm, Sweden, 2013).
  12. J Higgins, A Primer for Monitoring Water Funds (The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA, Available at www.fondosdeagua.org/sites/default/files/Water%20Funds_Monitoring%20Primer_TNC_2013.pdf. Accessed May 22, 2015. (2013).
  13. A Vogl, Resource Investment Optimization System: Introduction & Theoretical Documentation (Natural Capital Project, Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA, Available at naturalcapitalproject.org/RIOS.html. Accessed May 22, 2015. (2015).
  14. ; IHDP-UNU and UNEP The Inclusive Wealth Report 2014 (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK, 2014).
  15. DE Stokes Pasteurs Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation (Brookings Institute, Washington, DC, 1997).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 801–900 of 1,000

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Guerry, A. D., Polasky, S., Lubchenco, J., Chaplin-Kramer, R., Daily, G. C., Griffin, R., Ruckelshaus, M., Bateman, I. J., Duraiappah, A., Elmqvist, T., Feldman, M. W., Folke, C., Hoekstra, J., Kareiva, P. M., Keeler, B. L., Li, S., McKenzie, E., Ouyang, Z., Reyers, B., Ricketts, T. H., Rockström, J., Tallis, H., & Vira, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Oregon State University (US)
  • Woods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305;
  • Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences (SE)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • University of East Anglia (GB)
  • Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Education for Peace and Sustainable Development, New Delhi 110 029, India;
  • Stockholm Resilience Centre (SE)
  • World Wildlife Fund, Washington, DC 20037;
  • The Nature Conservancy (US)
  • Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
  • World Wildlife Fund (US)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (ZA)
  • University of Vermont (US)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
ORCID
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Publisher
National Academy of Sciences
Published
2015-06-15
Volume
112
Issue
24
Pages
7348-7355
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
DOI
10.1073/pnas.1503751112
PMC
PMC4475956
OpenAlex
W1540250989
Cited by
1,017
References
108
Citations by year
2026: 66 · 2025: 75 · 2024: 88 · 2023: 98 · 2022: 107 · 2021: 110 · 2020: 126 · 2019: 91 · 2018: 95 · 2017: 87 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 16
FWCI
69.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences OpenIR (Chinese Academy of Sciences) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Keywords
natural capital, ecosystem services, decision-making, Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, human well-being, sustainability, ecological restoration, policy reform, interdisciplinary research, evidence-based policy, institutional change, poverty reduction
MeSH terms
Animals, Conservation of Natural Resources, Decision Making, Ecology, Humans, Public Policy, Ecosystem

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review