Cited by 17Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesMind wandering and attentionCognitive Functions and Memory

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Transcranial direct current stimulation to lateral prefrontal cortex could increase meta-awareness of mind wandering

Open access
Fox, Kieran C. R., Christoff, Kalina·2015·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

In a recent article, Axelrod et al. (1) present the results of an intriguing transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) study, showing that noninvasive electrical stimulation of the dorsolateral and rostrolateral prefrontal cortex (PFC) increases the propensity to mind-wander. Further, they show that sham stimulation at these same PFC sites does not increase mind wandering, nor does veridical stimulation of the occipital cortex. Given the widespread tendency in cognitive neuroscience to focus attention largely or solely on the role of the default mode network in mind wandering, this study represents an important step toward a better appreciation of the roles of many other brain areas, …

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1504686112

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. 10.1073/pnas.1421435112 · DOI
  2. 10.1080/17588921003632529 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.12.016 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Fox, K. C. R., & Christoff, K.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada; and
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2015-04-09
Volume
112
Issue
19
Pages
E2414-E2414
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1970209400
Cited by
17
References
2
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
transcranial direct current stimulation, lateral prefrontal cortex, meta-awareness, mind wandering, self-awareness, attention
MeSH terms
Attention, Female, Humans, Male, Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review